Radiology Patient Outcome Measures: Impact of a Departmental Pay-for-Performance Initiative on Key Quality and Safety Measures

被引:1
作者
Enamandram, Sheila S. [1 ]
Burk, Kristine S. [1 ,2 ]
Dang, Pragya A. [3 ]
Mar, Wenhong W. [1 ]
Centerbar, Cynthia [1 ]
Boland, Giles W. [1 ,4 ]
Khorasani, Ramin [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Imaging, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Radiol Dept Qual & Safety Officer,Dept Radiol, Director Qual & Safety Abdominal Imaging & Interv, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ctr Evidence Imaging, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Qual & Safety, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Pay-for-performance; peer learning; process improvement; quality; timeliness; NOTIFICATION SYSTEM; CARE; COMMUNICATION; SUGGESTIONS; METRICS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.032
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Assess impact of a multifaceted pay-for-performance (PFP) initiative on radiologists' behavior regarding key quality and safety measures. Methods: This institutional review board-approved prospective study was performed at a large, 12-division urban academic radiology department. Radiology patient outcome measures were implemented October 1, 2017, measuring report signature timeliness, critical results communication, and generation of peer-learning communications between radiologists. Subspecialty division-wide and individual radiologist targets were specified, performance was transparently communicated on an intranet dashboard updated daily, and performance was financially incentivized (5% of salary) quarterly. We compared outcomes 12 months pre- versus 12 months post-PFP implementation. Primary outcome was monthly 90th percentile time from scan completion to final report signature (CtoF). Secondary outcomes were percentage timely closed-loop communication of critical results and number of division-wide peer-learning communications. Statistical process control analysis and parallel coordinates charts were used to assess for temporal trends. Results: In all, 144 radiologists generated 1,255,771 reports (613,273 pre-PFP) during the study period. Monthly 90th percentile CtoF exhibited an absolute decrease of 4.4 hours (from 21.1 to 16.7 hours) and a 20.9% relative decrease post-PFP. Statistical process control analysis demonstrated significant decreases in 90th percentile CtoF post-PFP, sustained throughout the study period (P < .003). Between 95% (119 of 125, July 1, 2018, to September 30, 2018) and 98.4% (126 of 128, October 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017) of radiologists achieved >90% timely closure of critical alerts; all divisions exceeded the target of 90 peer-learning communications each quarter (range: 97-472) after January 1, 2018. Discussion: Implementation of a multifaceted PFP initiative using well-defined radiology patient outcome measures correlated with measurable improvements in radiologist behavior regarding key quality and safety parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 981
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   On Quality Metrics and Quantitative Imaging [J].
Abramson, Richard G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (02) :367-372
[2]  
American College of Radiology (ACR), Imaging 3.0
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW, DOI DOI 10.17226/10027
[4]   Impact of a 4-year Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Communication of Critical Imaging Test Results [J].
Anthony, Shawn G. ;
Prevedello, Luciano M. ;
Damiano, Maria M. ;
Gandhi, Tejal K. ;
Doubilet, Peter M. ;
Seltzer, Steven E. ;
Khorasani, Ramin .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (03) :802-807
[5]   Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement [J].
Benneyan, JC ;
Lloyd, RC ;
Plsek, PE .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (06) :458-464
[6]   Report of the ACR's Economics Committee on Value-Based Payment Models [J].
Boland, Giles W. ;
Glenn, Lucille ;
Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit ;
Jha, Saurabh ;
Mangano, Mark ;
Patel, Samir ;
Schoppe, Kurt A. ;
Seidenwurm, David ;
Lohnes, John ;
Silva, Ezequiel, III ;
Abramson, Richard ;
Durand, Daniel J. ;
Pattie, Laura ;
Kassing, Pamela ;
Heller, Richard E., III .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (01) :6-14
[7]   A Roadmap for Value-Based Payments [J].
Boland, Giles W. ;
Duszak, Richard, Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (02) :170-172
[8]   Radiologist Report Turnaround Time: Impact of Pay-for-PerformanceMeasures [J].
Boland, Giles W. L. ;
Halpern, Elkan F. ;
Gazelle, G. Scott .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (03) :707-711
[9]   Quality Initiatives Statistical Control Charts: Simplifying the Analysis of Data for Quality Improvement [J].
Cheung, Yvonne Y. ;
Jung, Boyoun ;
Sohn, Jae Ho ;
Ogrinc, Greg .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2012, 32 (07) :2113-2126
[10]   Quality Initiatives Department Scorecard: A Tool to Help Drive Imaging Care Delivery Performance [J].
Donnelly, Lane F. ;
Gessner, Kevin E. ;
Dickerson, Julie M. ;
Koch, Bernadette L. ;
Towbin, Alexander J. ;
Lehkamp, Todd W. ;
Moskovitz, Jay ;
Brody, Alan S. ;
Dumoulin, Charles L. ;
Jones, Blaise V. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (07) :2029-2038