Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI

被引:15
作者
Bae, Jae Seok [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Yoon, Jeong Hee [1 ,3 ]
Kang, Hyo-Jin [1 ,3 ]
Jeon, Sun Kyung [1 ,3 ]
Joo, Ijin [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Kyoung Bun [2 ]
Kim, Haeryoung [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; BRIDGE;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2021203537
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), version 2018, treatment response algorithm (TRA) is used to assess hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after local-regional therapy (LRT). However, its diagnostic performance has not yet been fully compared between CT and hepatobiliary agent (HBA)-enhanced MRI in patients who have undergone liver transplant (LT). Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS TRA when using CT versus using HBA-enhanced MRI in an intraindividual manner according to pathologic results. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and September 2019, 165 patients with 237 clinically suspected HCCs underwent LRT followed by LT and were retrospectively included. All patients underwent both CT and HBA-enhanced MRI after LRT and before LT. Three radiologists independently assessed tumor viability with both modalities by using LI-RADS TRA and reached a consensus. Pathologic tumor viability categorized as either completely (100%) or incompletely (<100%) necrotic obtained from the explanted liver served as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of the LI-RADS TRA in the consensus reading were then compared between CT and HBA-enhanced MRI by using the ratio estimator approach. Interobserver agreements were calculated by using Fleiss k statistics. Results: There were 165 patients (mean age, 62 years 6 9 [standard deviation]; 135 men) with a total of 237 lesions, of which 107 were viable tumors (45.1%) at pathologic evaluation. With the LI-RADS TRA, sensitivity and specificity of the viable category for detection of viable HCCs at pathologic evaluation were 42.1% (45 of 107 lesions) and 95.4% (124 of 130 lesions) with CT and 52.3% (56 of 107 lesions) and 93.9% (122 of 130 lesions) with HBA-enhanced MRI, with a significant difference in sensitivity butnot specificity (P =.009 and P =.42, respectively). Interobserver agreements for the LI-RADS TRA were substantial for both CTand HBA-enhanced MRI (k, 0.69 for both). Conclusion: In patients who underwent local-regional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplant, hepatobiliary agent-enhanced MRI was more sensitive than CT in evaluating tumor viability with the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2018, treatment response algorithm. (C) RSNA, 2021
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 345
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Does pathological response after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with cirrhosis predict outcome after liver resection or transplantation?
    Allard, Marc-Antoine
    Sebagh, Mylene
    Ruiz, Aldrick
    Guettier, Catherine
    Paule, Bernard
    Vibert, Eric
    Cunha, Antonio Sa
    Cherqui, Daniel
    Samuel, Didier
    Bismuth, Henri
    Castaing, Denis
    Adam, Rene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 63 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [2] American College of Radiology, CT MRI LI RADS V2018
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, STAT METHODS DIAGNOS
  • [4] The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chaudhry, Mohammad
    McGinty, Katrina A.
    Mervak, Benjamin
    Lerebours, Reginald
    Li, Cai
    Shropshire, Erin
    Ronald, James
    Commander, Leah
    Hertel, Johann
    Luo, Sheng
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Burke, Lauren M. B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (02) : 320 - 326
  • [5] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Do, Richard K.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Tang, An
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 816 - 830
  • [6] Comparison of Acute Transient Dyspnea after Intravenous Administration of Gadoxetate Disodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine: Effect on Arterial Phase Image Quality
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Viglianti, Benjamin L.
    Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M.
    Caoili, Elaine M.
    Kaza, Ravi K.
    Liu, Peter S. C.
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    Hussain, Hero K.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (02) : 452 - 461
  • [7] Pathologic Response to Pretransplant Locoregional Therapy is Predictive of Patient Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Analysis From the US Multicenter HCC Transplant Consortium
    DiNorcia, Joseph
    Florman, Sander S.
    Haydel, Brandy
    Tabrizian, Parissa
    Ruiz, Richard M.
    Klintmalm, Goran B.
    Senguttuvan, Srinath
    Lee, David D.
    Taner, C. Burcin
    Verna, Elizabeth C.
    Halazun, Karim J.
    Hoteit, Maarouf
    Levine, Matthew H.
    Chapman, William C.
    Vachharajani, Neeta
    Aucejo, Federico
    Nguyen, Mindie H.
    Melcher, Marc L.
    Tevar, Amit D.
    Humar, Abhinav
    Mobley, Constance
    Ghobrial, Mark
    Nydam, Trevor L.
    Amundsen, Beth
    Markmann, James F.
    Berumen, Jennifer
    Hemming, Alan W.
    Langnas, Alan N.
    Carney, Carol A.
    Sudan, Debra L.
    Hong, Johnny C.
    Kim, Joohyun
    Zimmerman, Michael A.
    Rana, Abbas
    Kueht, Michael L.
    Jones, Christopher M.
    Fishbein, Thomas M.
    Markovic, Daniela
    Busuttil, Ronald W.
    Agopian, Vatche G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (04) : 616 - 624
  • [8] AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    Kulik, Laura M.
    Finn, Richard S.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Abecassis, Michael M.
    Roberts, Lewis R.
    Zhu, Andrew X.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Marrero, Jorge A.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 67 (01) : 358 - 380
  • [9] Radiologic Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Viability after Transhepatic Arterial Chemoembolization: Estimating the Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Cross-sectional Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation
    Hunt, Stephen J.
    Yu, Woojin
    Weintraub, Joshua
    Prince, Martin R.
    Kothary, Nishita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [10] Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm
    Kielar, Ania
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Lewis, Sara
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Miller, Frank H.
    Yarmohammadi, Hooman
    Kim, Charles
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Newton, Isabel
    Do, Richard K.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 218 - 230