Prognostic Value of TERT Alterations, Mutational and Copy Number Alterations Burden in Urothelial Carcinoma

被引:33
|
作者
Isharwal, Sumit [1 ]
Audenet, Franois [1 ]
Drill, Esther [2 ]
Pietzak, Eugene J. [1 ]
Iyer, Gopa [3 ,4 ]
Ostrovnaya, Irina [2 ]
Cha, Eugene [1 ]
Donahue, Timothy [1 ]
Arcila, Maria [5 ]
Jayakumaran, Gowtham [5 ]
Berger, Michael F. [5 ]
Rosenberg, Jonathan E. [3 ]
Bajorin, Dean F. [3 ]
Coleman, Jonathan [1 ]
Dalbagni, Guido [1 ]
Reuter, Victor E. [5 ]
Bochner, Bernard H. [1 ]
Solit, David B. [3 ,4 ]
Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Genitourinary Oncol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Human Oncol & Pathogenesis Program, New York, NY 10065 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2019年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
PROMOTER MUTATIONS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2017.07.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Point mutations in the TERT gene promoter occur at high frequency in multiple cancers, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the relationship between TERT promoter mutations and UC patient outcomes is unclear due to conflicting reports in the literature. In this study, we examined the association of TERT alterations, tumor mutational burden per megabase (Mb), and copy number alteration (CNA) burden with clinical parameters and their prognostic value in a cohort of 398 urothelial tumors. The majority of TERT mutations were located at two promoter region hotspots (chromosome 5, 1 295 228 C > T and 1 295 250 C > T). TERT alterations were more frequently present in bladder tumors than in upper tract tumors (73% vs 53%; p = 0.001). ARID1A, PIK3CA, RB1, ERCC2, ERBB2, TSC1, CDKN1A, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and PTPRD alterations showed significant co-occurrence with TERT alterations (all p < 0.0025). TERT alterations and the mutational burden/Mb were independently associated with overall survival (hazard ratio[HR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-3.65; p < 0.001; and HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p = 0.002), disease-specific survival (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.41-3.53; p < 0.001; and HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p = 0.002), and metastasis-free survival (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05-2.53; p = 0.029; and HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; p = 0.063) in multivariate models. Patient summary: The majority of TERT gene mutations that we detected in urothelial carcinoma are located at two promoter hotspots. Urothelial tumors with TERT alterations had worse prognosis compared to tumors without TERT alterations, whereas tumors with a higher mutational burden had more favorable outcome compared to tumors with low mutational burden. (c) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 204
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic and predictive genetic alterations in upper tract urothelial carcinoma
    Gakis, G.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 37 : 176 - 177
  • [22] Prognostic and predictive role of tumor mutation burden and copy number alterations across metastatic cancer: Immunotherapeutic implications
    Tang, Xin-Ran
    Dong, Zhong Yi
    Wu, Dehua
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (13)
  • [23] Identification of prognostic biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma via long noncoding RNAs expression and copy number alterations
    Du, Weibo
    Chen, Wenbiao
    Shu, Zheyue
    Xiang, Dairong
    Bi, Kefan
    Lu, Yingfeng
    Zhang, Xujun
    Li, Lanjuan
    Diao, Hongyan
    EPIGENOMICS, 2020, 12 (15) : 1303 - 1315
  • [24] Mutational Profile and Copy Number Alterations of Follicular Lymphoma Patients with Different Clinical Behavior
    Mozas, Pablo
    Lopez, Cristina
    Grau, Marta
    Valle, Sara
    Castellano, Giancarlo
    Navarro, Alba
    Nadeu, Ferran
    Gonzalez-Farre, Blanca
    Rivas-Delgado, Alfredo
    Rivero, Andrea
    Correa, Juan Gonzalo
    Castillo, Carlos
    Olga, Balague
    Gine, Eva
    Delgado, Julio
    Villamor, Neus
    Pinyol, Magda
    Perez-Galan, Patricia
    Magnano, Laura
    Campo, Elias
    Enjuanes, Anna
    Bea, Silvia
    Armando, Lopez-Guillermo
    BLOOD, 2020, 136
  • [25] Copy number alterations in colorectal cancer
    Huang, Lei
    Xu, A-Man
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (01): : 204 - 214
  • [26] Copy number alterations in lung cancer
    Dalay, N.
    Baykara, O.
    Bakir, B.
    Demirkaya, A.
    Buyru, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S93 - S93
  • [27] GENOMIC COPY NUMBER ALTERATIONS IN EPENDYOMOMA
    Avigad, Smadar
    Miller, Yulia Margolin
    Fichman-Horn, Suzana
    Feinmesser, Meora
    Michowitz, Shalom
    Witt, Hendrik
    Pfister, Stefan M.
    Kool, Marcel
    Pajtler, Kristian
    Yaniv, Isaac
    Toledano, Helen
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 : 15 - 15
  • [28] Nasopharyngeal carcinoma molecular subgroups for somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs)
    Dai, Wei
    Chung, Dittman Lai-Shun
    Chow, Larry Ka-Yue
    Leong, Merrin Man-Long
    Chan, Candy King-Chi
    Ko, Josephine Mun-Yee
    Lung, Maria Li
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)
  • [29] Sex Disparity and Copy Number Alterations in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Sanford, Nina N.
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Royce, Trevor J.
    Pike, Luke R. G.
    Hwang, William L.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 17 (06) : 1207 - 1209
  • [30] Genomic Copy Number Alterations in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Features
    Ito, Timothy
    Pei, Jianming
    Dulaimi, Essel
    Menges, Craig
    Abbosh, Philip H.
    Smaldone, Marc C.
    Chen, David Y. T.
    Greenberg, Richard E.
    Kutikov, Alexander
    Viterbo, Rosalia
    Uzzo, Robert G.
    Testa, Joseph R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : 852 - 858