MEASURING READING COMPLEXITY AND LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF CANADIAN POLICE CAUTIONS

被引:17
作者
Eastwood, Joseph [1 ]
Snook, Brent [1 ]
Chaulk, Sarah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Psychol, Bounded Rational & Law Lab, St John, NF A1B 3X9, Canada
关键词
police caution; reading complexity; listening comprehension; Charter rights; Miranda warnings; interrogations; MIRANDA WARNINGS; DEFENDANTS; COMPETENCE; AGREEMENT; LANGUAGE; ENGLAND; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1177/0093854810362053
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The reading complexity and listening comprehension of Canadian police cautions were measured. In Study 1, the complexity of 44 unique Canadian police cautions was assessed using five readability measures (Flesch-Kincaid reading level, sentence complexity, use of difficult words, use of infrequent words, and number of words). Results showed that 7 (37%) of the rightto- silence cautions (n = 19) and none of the right-to-legal-counsel cautions (n = 25) reached acceptable cutoff levels for all five measures. In Study 2, university students (N = 121) were presented with one of three cautions verbally and were asked to explain its meaning. Despite variations in complexity across the three cautions, participants understood approximately one third of the information contained in the cautions. The extent to which the needs of Canadian suspects and police organizations are being met and the validity of reading complexity as a predictor of listening comprehension are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 471
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The Principles of Readability
[2]  
Bell K., 1984, Journal of Correctional Education, V35, P129
[3]   OPTIMAL RATE OF READING PROSE [J].
CARVER, RP .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1982, 18 (01) :56-88
[4]   MAKING LEGAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDABLE - PSYCHOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS [J].
CHARROW, RP ;
CHARROW, VR .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1979, 79 (07) :1306-1374
[5]  
Clare ICH, 1998, J COMMUNITY APPL SOC, V8, P323, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(1998090)8:5<323::AID-CASP448>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-U
[7]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[9]  
Cooke D.J., 1998, LEGAL CRIMINOL PSYCH, V3, P13, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00349.x
[10]  
CRANE JA, 1996, J EMERG MED, V15, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0736-4679(96)00261-2