A global overview of biodiversity offsetting governance

被引:24
作者
Droste, Nils [1 ,2 ]
Olsson, Johanna Alkan [3 ]
Hanson, Helena [3 ]
Knaggard, Asa [1 ,3 ]
Lima, Guilherme [4 ]
Lundmark, Linda [3 ]
Thoni, Terese [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Zelli, Fariborz [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Polit Sci, Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Ctr Innovat Res, Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Sci, Lund, Sweden
[4] Fed Univ Rio Janeiro, Coppe, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] UFZ, Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Polit, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Biodiversity offsetting; Comparative environmental politics; Conservation governance; Regime complex; NO NET LOSS; WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION; CONSERVATION BANKING; REGIME COMPLEX; RESEARCH GAPS; POLICY; CHALLENGES; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115231
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We analyze the development of biodiversity offsetting governance through a research-weaving approach. Here, we combine information from a systematized review of the literature and a qualitative analysis of the institutional developments in different world regions. Through this triangulation, we synthesize and map the different developmental streams of biodiversity offsetting governance around the globe over the last four decades. We find that there is a global mainstreaming of core principles such as avoidance, no-net-loss, and a mitigation hierarchy, as well as pooling and trading of offsets for unavoidable residual damages. Furthermore, we can observe an ongoing diversification of institutional designs and actors involved. Together this constitutes an emerging regime complex of biodiversity offsetting governance that comes with both a set of shared norms and a growing institutional complexity. While this may imply institutional innovation through diversification and policy experimentation, it also raises questions regarding the effectiveness of offsetting practices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biodiversity Offsetting's Lingering Issue: Under-Compensation
    Conti, Ludovico Giacomo
    ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [42] A Review of Condition Metrics Used in Biodiversity Offsetting
    Clarice Borges-Matos
    Martine Maron
    Jean Paul Metzger
    Environmental Management, 2023, 72 : 727 - 740
  • [43] No net loss of what, for whom?: stakeholder perspectives to Biodiversity Offsetting in England
    Oliver Taherzadeh
    Peter Howley
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2018, 20 : 1807 - 1830
  • [44] Offsetting impacts of development on biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Laura J. Sonter
    Ascelin Gordon
    Carla Archibald
    Jeremy S. Simmonds
    Michelle Ward
    Jean Paul Metzger
    Jonathan R. Rhodes
    Martine Maron
    Ambio, 2020, 49 : 892 - 902
  • [45] Calculation of biodiversity level between different land-uses to improve conservation outcomes of biodiversity offsetting
    Millon, Lara
    Barre, Kevin
    Julliard, Romain
    Compere, Pierre
    Kerbiriou, Christian
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 101
  • [46] Biodiversity Offsetting: Ethical Views within Environmental Organisations in the European Union
    Karlsson, Mikael
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [47] Biodiversity offsetting as a commodification process: A French case study as a concrete example
    Dauguet, Benoit
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 192 : 533 - 540
  • [48] An uncertain soil transfer. The surprises of ecological restoration and biodiversity offsetting
    Brunet, Lucas
    REVUE D ANTHROPOLOGIE DES CONNAISSANCES, 2020, 14 (04):
  • [49] The biodiversity offsets as market-based instruments in global governance: Origins, success and controversies
    Hrabanski, Marie
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 15 : 143 - 151
  • [50] Realising a vision of no net loss through marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia
    Niner, Holly J.
    Milligan, Ben
    Jones, Peter J. S.
    Styan, Craig A.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 148 : 22 - 30