Learning orientation and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions

被引:37
作者
Baker, William E. [1 ]
Mukherjee, Debmalya [2 ]
Perin, Marcelo Gattermann [3 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Coll Business Adm, Dept Mkt, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Univ Akron, Coll Business, Dept Management, 259 South Broadway, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[3] Fundacao Getulio Vargas FGV, Sao Paulo Sch Business Adm EAESP, Dept Mkt, Ave 9 Julho 2029, BR-01313902 Bela Vista, SP, Brazil
关键词
Learning Orientation; Market orientation; Entrepreneurial orientation; Competitive advantage; Strategic orientation; Dynamic capabilities; MARKET ORIENTATION; ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MODERATING ROLE; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; SERVICE DEVELOPMENT; CAUSAL AMBIGUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is widely accepted that a strong learning orientation (LO) leverages organizations' ability to achieve competitive advantage. It is also widely accepted that LO is correlated and works in conjunction with strategic orientations to accomplish this end. Yet, the nomological clarity of the relationships between LO and the key strategic orientations remains equivocal. In this paper, we take a step back to better understand the state of LO research, including its relationship with strategic orientations. As a part of this synthesis, we offer several criticisms of the LO literature that hinders its conceptual development as an initiator of capability enhancement, innovation, and performance. A key assertion is that LO is not a strategic orientation per se because it influences the quality of informational inputs into strategic planning, not their focus. That is, LO does not direct firms towards a particular strategic approach as do strategic orientations. Instead, as a dynamic capability it motivates firms to monitor and improve the quality of information used to operationalize all strategic orientations. As such, it improves the efficacy of whichever strategic orientation(s) firms choose to adopt.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 873
页数:11
相关论文
共 127 条
  • [1] Aguinis H., 2017, ORGAN RES METHODS, V20, P665, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1094428115627498, 10.1177/1094428115627498]
  • [2] Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation
    Anderson, Brian S.
    Kreiser, Patrick M.
    Kuratko, Donald F.
    Hornsby, Jeffrey S.
    Eshima, Yoshihiro
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (10) : 1579 - 1596
  • [3] UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND STRATEGIC LEARNING CAPABILITY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
    Anderson, Brian S.
    Covin, Jeffrey G.
    Slevin, Dennis P.
    [J]. STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2009, 3 (03) : 218 - 240
  • [4] Argyris C., 1974, THEORY PRACTICE INCR
  • [5] Argyris Chris, 1978, Organizational Learning
  • [6] Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation
    Atuahene-Gima, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) : 61 - 83
  • [7] Market orientation and innovation
    AtuaheneGima, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1996, 35 (02) : 93 - 103
  • [8] Managing internationalization and innovation tradeoffs in entrepreneurial firms: Evidence from transition economies
    Bahl, Mona
    Lahiri, Somnath
    Mukherjee, Debmalya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2021, 56 (01)
  • [9] Baker W.E., 1999, J MARKET FOCUSED MAN, V4, P295
  • [10] Baker W.E., 2002, Journal of Market-Focused Management, V5, P5, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1012543911149