Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions

被引:42
作者
Buschmann, Christoph [1 ]
Roeder, Norbert [1 ]
Berglund, Kerstin [2 ]
Berglund, Orjan [2 ]
Laerke, Poul Erik [3 ]
Maddison, Martin [4 ]
Mander, Ulo [4 ]
Myllys, Merja [5 ]
Osterburg, Bernhard [6 ]
van den Akker, Jan J. H. [7 ]
机构
[1] Thuenen Inst Rural Studies, Bundesallee 64, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Soil & Environm, Box 7014, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Aarhus Univ, Blithers Alle 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[4] Univ Tartu, Vanemuise St 46, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia
[5] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Jokioinen 31600, Finland
[6] Thuenen Inst Coordinat Unit Climate & Soil, Bundesallee 49, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[7] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Environm Res, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
Peatland management; Climate mitigation; Social-ecological system framework; FRAMEWORK; PEATLANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104181
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In Northern, Eastern and Central European countries, peat soils drained for agriculture are a considerable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Since emissions from this source have high mitigation potential, they will likely be a focus of the European Union's future climate goals. We describe and compare the similarities and differences in the socioeconomic and ecological business environment that policy makers, planners and farmers are confronted with when developing tailored proposals for low emission land use alternatives on peat land. The analysis is based on interviews with 33 typical farmers cultivating organic soils and on expert group discussions held in six different Northern, Eastern and Central European regions. Based on the Social-Ecological System Framework we identify and cluster important variables. Our results show that mainly hard economic variables determine preferred land use alternatives: the productivity of resource systems, the economic value of land and market incentives. Other variables, such as the heterogeneity of users and conflicts among them, are more important with respect to the implementation of alternatives. We point out possibilities to transfer solutions between regions and discuss an institutional framework for European Union, national and regional levels for facilitating implementation potential.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Amblard L., 2012, P C DES DYN I COLL A
  • [2] Avagyan A, 2014, CLIMATE RESPONSIBLE
  • [3] Adapting to Socioeconomic Developments by Changing Rules in the Governance of Common Property Pastures in the Swiss Alps
    Baur, Ivo
    Binder, Claudia R.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (04):
  • [4] Cooper T., 2009, technical report (No. 30- CE- 0233091/00-28
  • [5] Couwenberg J, 2013, MIRES PEAT, V12
  • [6] Danish Ministry of Environment and Food, 2010, BEK JORDR ANV DYRKN
  • [7] Dierssen K., 2001, MOORE OKOSYSTEME MIT
  • [8] Drosler M., 2013, Klimaschutz Durch Moorschutz. Schlussbericht des BMBF-Vorhabens: Klimaschutz - Moornutzungsstrategien 2006-2010.
  • [9] EC, 2018, CLIM STRAT TARG 2050
  • [10] FLEISCHMAN FD, 2010, E S, V15