Dynamic assessment of urban resilience to natural hazards

被引:65
作者
Feofilovs, Maksims [1 ]
Romagnoli, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Azenes Iela 12-1, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Causal loop diagrams; Disasters; Modelling; Monte Carlo; Probabilistic simulations; System dynamics; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INFRASTRUCTURE; ADAPTATION; INDICATORS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The current urbanization and increase of intensity and likelihood of natural hazard events underline that particular attention must be addressed to strengthening urban resilience to natural hazards. Indicator-based urban resilience assessment tools approach have certain disadvantages, which do not allow considering systemic interaction in terms of feedbacks effects among the urban system components selected for urban resilience assessment. This peculiarity can be provided by system dynamics modelling. This study aims to introduce a dynamic urban resilience to natural hazards assessment tool able to compare different urban resilience scenarios, considering the multi-dimensionality of urban systems and short and long term time reference. As a result of this study, the paper presents the structure of a novel tool and comparison of urban resilience scenarios performed for a local case study with the given tool. Specifically, the implementation of probabilistic simulation in system dynamics model with output in form of index score allows comparison of urban resilience scenarios. The results of model validation and simulation show that the tool is suitable for different urban resilience scenario evaluation, thus is suitable for the development of urban resilience strategies within urban policy planning.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: Practitioners' frames and practices [J].
Aldunce, Paulina ;
Beilin, Ruth ;
Howden, Mark ;
Handmer, John .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 30 :1-11
[2]   Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement [J].
Angeler, David G. ;
Allen, Craig R. ;
Garmestani, Ahjond ;
Pope, Kevin L. ;
Twidwell, Dirac ;
Bundschuh, Mirco .
BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 101 (05) :543-548
[3]  
Anggraini A.R., 2016, COUNTRY RISK PROFILE, V180
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 3 WORLD C DIS RISL R 3 WORLD C DIS RISL R, P169
[5]  
Apreda C, 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE URBAN CLIMATE CHANGE URBAN, V1, P233
[6]   An augmented approach for measurement of disaster resilience using connective factor analysis and analytic network process (F'ANP) model [J].
Asadzadeh, Asad ;
Koetter, Theo ;
Zebardast, Esfandiar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2015, 14 :504-518
[7]   Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap [J].
Becker, William ;
Saisana, Michaela ;
Paruolo, Paolo ;
Vandecasteele, Ine .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 80 :12-22
[8]  
Blumberga A., 2011, SYSTEM DYNAMICS ENV SYSTEM DYNAMICS ENV, P351
[9]   Enabling Stakeholder Involvement in Coastal Disaster Resilience Planning [J].
Bostick, Thomas P. ;
Holzer, Thomas H. ;
Sarkani, Shahryar .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (06) :1181-1200
[10]   Mapping urban resilience to disasters - A review [J].
Cariolet, Jean-Marie ;
Vuillet, Marc ;
Diab, Youssef .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 51