Validation of a Standardized Home Visual Acuity Test for Teleophthalmology

被引:10
作者
Siktberg, Jonathan [1 ]
Hamdan, Saif [1 ]
Liu, Yuhan [2 ]
Chen, Qingxia [2 ]
Donahue, Sean P. [3 ]
Patel, Shriji N. [3 ]
Sternberg, Paul, Jr. [3 ]
Robinson, Joshua [3 ]
Kammer, Jeffrey A. [3 ]
Gangaputra, Sapna S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Eye Inst, Sch Med, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biostat, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Eye Inst, Sch Med, 2311 Pierce Ave,Suite 2251, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Eye Inst, Sch Med, 2311 Pierce Ave,Suite 2251, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE | 2021年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Home visual acuity chart; Remote ETDRS chart; Telehealth; Tele-ophthalmology; Visual acuity; DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY; SNELLEN; ETDRS; CHART; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.xops.2021.100007
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The recent exponential growth in teleophthalmology has been limited in part by the lack of a validated method to measure visual acuity (VA) remotely. We investigated the validity of a self-administered Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) home VA test. We hypothesized that a home VA test with a printout ETDRS chart is equivalent to a standard technician-administered VA test in clinic.Design: Prospective cohort study.Participants: Two hundred nine eyes from 108 patients who had a scheduled in-person outpatient ophthalmology clinic visit at an academic medical center.Methods: Enrolled patients were sent a .pdf document consisting of instructions and a printout ETDRS vision chart calibrated for 5 feet. Patients completed the VA test at home before the in-person appointment, where their VA was measured by an ophthalmic technician using a standard ETDRS chart. Survey questions about the ease of testing and barriers to completion were administered. For the bioequivalence test with a 5% nominal level, the 2 1-sided tests procedure was used, and an equivalent 90% confidence interval (CI) was constructed and compared with the prespecified 7-letter equivalence margin.Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the mean adjusted letter score difference between the home and clinic tests. Secondary outcomes included the unadjusted letter difference, absolute letter difference, and survey question responses.Results: The mean adjusted VA letter score difference was 4.1 letters (90% CI, 3.2-4.9 letters), well within the 7-letter equivalence margin. Average unadjusted VA scores in clinic were 3.9 letters (90% CI, 3.1-4.7 letters) more than scores at home. The absolute difference was 5.2 letters (90% CI, 4.6-5.9 letters). Ninety-eight percent of patients agreed that the home test was easy to perform.Conclusions: An ETDRS VA test self-administered at home following a standardized protocol was equivalent to a standard technician-administered VA test in clinic in the examined population. Ophthalmology Science 2021;1:100007 & COPY; 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Adams Matthew K, 2016, Int Ophthalmol Clin, V56, P47, DOI 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000138
[2]  
American Academy of Ophthalmology, HOM EYE TEST CHILDR
[3]  
American Academy of Ophthalmology, REC URG NON PAT CAR
[4]   A computerized method of visual acuity testing: Adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol [J].
Beck, RW ;
Moke, PS ;
Turpin, AH ;
Ferris, FL ;
Sangiovanni, JP ;
Johnson, CA ;
Birch, EE ;
Chandler, DL ;
Cox, TA ;
Blair, RC ;
Kraker, RT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 135 (02) :194-205
[5]   Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Measurement for Screening and Clinical Assessment [J].
Brady, Christopher J. ;
Eghrari, Allen O. ;
Labrique, Alain B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (24) :2682-+
[6]   Material community deprivation and hospital utilization during the first year of life: an urban population-based cohort study [J].
Brokamp, Cole ;
Beck, Andrew F. ;
Goyal, Neera K. ;
Ryan, Patrick ;
Greenberg, James M. ;
Hall, Eric S. .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 30 :37-43
[7]   The use of 95% CI or 90% CI for drug product development - a controversial issue? [J].
Chow, Shein-Chung ;
Zheng, Jiayin .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 29 (05) :834-844
[8]   An innovative visual acuity chart for urgent and primary care settings: validation of the Runge near vision card [J].
Cooke, Matthew D. ;
Winter, Patricia A. ;
McKenney, Kaitlin C. ;
Packard, Krissa L. ;
Williams, Vesper ;
Dorsey, Eleanor A. ;
Szabo, Aniko ;
Visotcky, Alexis ;
Warren, Clinton C. ;
Wirostko, William J. ;
Weinberg, David, V ;
Kim, Judy E. ;
Hang, Dennis P. .
EYE, 2019, 33 (07) :1104-1110
[9]   Evaluation of a Home-Printable Vision Screening Test for Telemedicine [J].
Crossland, Michael D. ;
Dekker, Tessa M. ;
Hancox, Joanne ;
Lisi, Matteo ;
Wemyss, Thomas A. ;
Thomas, Peter B. M. .
JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 139 (03) :271-277
[10]   THE USE OF ACCURATE VISUAL-ACUITY MEASUREMENTS IN CLINICAL ANTI-CATARACT FORMULATION TRIALS [J].
ELLIOTT, DB ;
SHERIDAN, M .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1988, 8 (04) :397-401