Models of nonlinear stream aquifer transients

被引:17
作者
Serrano, Sergio E.
Workman, S. R.
Srivastava, Kirti
Cleave, Brenda Miller-Van
机构
[1] HydrosScience Inc, Ambler, PA 19002 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Biosyst & Agr Engn, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
[3] Natl Geophys Res Inst, Hyderabad 500007, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
stream aquifer interaction; transient nonlinear Boussinesq equation; analytical solutions; decomposition;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.016
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The phenomenon of stream aquifer interaction was investigated via mathematical. modeling using the Boussinesq equation. The effect of highly fluctuating transient stream Level on the subsequent propagation of hydraulic transients in the adjacent aquifer was quantified using various solutions to the linearized and the nonlinear Boussinesq equation. The semigroup solution of the linearized equation, the spatial-partial decomposition solution of the nonlinear equation, the temporal-partial decomposition solution of the nonlinear equation, and a quasi nonlinear solution were investigated subject to a transient, large-amplitude, periodic boundary condition. The models were verified with a limited numerical solution to the nonlinear Boussinesq equation. The results indicated that the linearized model compared well with the temporal-partial solution and with a numerical solution, whereas the spatial-partial solution did not adequately reproduce the expected damping in the water table amplitude with distance. The linearized solution was sensitive to the chosen linearized transmissivity. The quasi nonlinear solution did not exhibit the natural attenuation of the head amplitude as distance increased, but could tend itself to practical applications of stream-aquifer interaction calculations subject to discrete-time irregular flood hydrographs. The temporal-partial nonlinear solution is simpler to derive than the linearized solution. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 205
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydraulic analysis on stream-aquifer interaction by storage function models
    Harada, M
    Hantush, MM
    Mariño, MA
    GROUND WATER UPDATES, 2000, : 229 - 234
  • [2] Stochastic modeling of transient stream-aquifer interaction with the nonlinear Boussinesq equation
    Srivastava, Kirti
    Serrano, Sergio E.
    Workman, S. R.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 328 (3-4) : 538 - 547
  • [3] Achilles' heel of integrated hydrologic models: The stream-aquifer flow exchange, and proposed alternative
    Morel-Seytoux, Hubert J.
    Miller, Calvin D.
    Mehl, Steffen
    Miracapillo, Cinzia
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2018, 564 : 900 - 908
  • [4] ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS TO THE STREAM-AQUIFER INTERACTION PROBLEM: A CRITICAL REVIEW
    Spanoudaki, K.
    Nanou-Giannarou, A.
    Paschalinos, Y.
    Memos, C. D.
    Stamou, A. I.
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2010, 12 (02): : 126 - 139
  • [5] Effects of stream-aquifer interaction on stream condition in an alluvial basin
    Harada, M
    Tsuge, Y
    Mariño, MA
    INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2001, (272): : 197 - 203
  • [6] A general framework of stream-aquifer interaction caused by variable stream stages
    Intaraprasong, Trin
    Zhan, Hongbin
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 373 (1-2) : 112 - 121
  • [7] Infiltration of atrazine and metabolites from a stream to an alluvial aquifer
    Squillace, PJ
    Burkart, MR
    Simpkins, WW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1997, 33 (01): : 89 - 95
  • [8] Numerical modelling of stream-aquifer interaction: Quantifying the impact of transient streambed permeability and aquifer heterogeneity
    Zhou, Dan
    Zhang, Ye
    Gianni, Guillaume
    Lichtner, Peter
    Engelhardt, Irina
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2018, 32 (14) : 2279 - 2292
  • [9] Unsaturated hyporheic zone flow in stream/aquifer conjunctive systems
    Fox, GA
    Durnford, DS
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2003, 26 (09) : 989 - 1000
  • [10] Incorporating transient storage in conjunctive stream-aquifer modeling
    Lin, YC
    Medina, MA
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2003, 26 (09) : 1001 - 1019