Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy

被引:24
作者
Schmidtke, Daniel [1 ]
Kuperman, Victor [1 ]
Gagne, Christina L. [2 ]
Spalding, Thomas L. [2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Linguist & Languages, Togo Salmon Hall,1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Word recognition; Morphology; Entropy; Lexical decision; Conceptual combination; CARIN THEORY; REPRESENTATION; COMPREHENSION; TRANSPARENCY; WORDS;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-015-0926-0
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Previous research has suggested that the conceptual representation of a compound is based on a relational structure linking the compound's constituents. Existing accounts of the visual recognition of modifier-head or noun-noun compounds posit that the process involves the selection of a relational structure out of a set of competing relational structures associated with the same compound. In this article, we employ the information-theoretic metric of entropy to gauge relational competition and investigate its effect on the visual identification of established English compounds. The data from two lexical decision megastudies indicates that greater entropy (i.e., increased competition) in a set of conceptual relations associated with a compound is associated with longer lexical decision latencies. This finding indicates that there exists competition between potential meanings associated with the same complex word form. We provide empirical support for conceptual composition during compound word processing in a model that incorporates the effect of the integration of co-activated and competing relational information.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 570
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification [J].
Amenta, Simona ;
Crepaldi, Davide .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
[2]   Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap [J].
Andrews, S ;
Miller, B ;
Rayner, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 16 (1-2) :285-311
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Phrase and paraphrase: Some innovative uses of language
[4]  
Baayen R.H., 1995, The CELEX database. Nijmegen: Center for Lexical Information
[5]   An Amorphous Model for Morphological Processing in Visual Comprehension Based on Naive Discriminative Learning [J].
Baayen, R. Harald ;
Milin, Petar ;
Durdevic, Dusica Filipovic ;
Hendrix, Peter ;
Marelli, Marco .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2011, 118 (03) :438-481
[6]   The English Lexicon Project [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Yap, Melvin J. ;
Cortese, Michael J. ;
Hutchison, Keith A. ;
Kessler, Brett ;
Loftis, Bjorn ;
Neely, James H. ;
Nelson, Douglas L. ;
Simpson, Greg B. ;
Treiman, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) :445-459
[7]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS REVISITED, REBUTTED [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 77 (377) :209-210
[8]   Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
New, Boris .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :977-990
[9]   THE INTERPRETATION OF ISOLATED NOVEL NOMINAL COMPOUNDS [J].
COOLEN, R ;
VANJAARSVELD, HJ ;
SCHREUDER, R .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1991, 19 (04) :341-352
[10]  
De Jong N. H., 2002, THESIS U NIJMEGEN NI