Learning Optimal Personalized Treatment Rules in Consideration of Benefit and Risk: With an Application to Treating Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Insulin Therapies

被引:43
作者
Wang, Yuanjia [1 ]
Fu, Haoda [2 ]
Zeng, Donglin [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Benefit-risk analysis; Hypoglycemia; Machine learning; Neyman-Pearson lemma; Personalized medicine; SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION; HYPOGLYCEMIA; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; UTILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1080/01621459.2017.1303386
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Individualized medical decision making is often complex due to patient treatment response heterogeneity. Pharmacotherapy may exhibit distinct efficacy and safety profiles for different patient populations. An optimal treatment that maximizes clinical benefit for a patient may also lead to concern of safety due to a high risk of adverse events. Thus, to guide individualized clinical decision making and deliver optimal tailored treatments, maximizing clinical benefit should be considered in the context of controlling for potential risk. In this work, we propose two approaches to identify personalized optimal treatment strategy that maximizes clinical benefit under a constraint on the average risk. We derive the theoretical optimal treatment rule under the risk constraint and draw an analogy to the Neyman-Pearson lemma to prove the theorem. We present algorithms that can be easily implemented by any off-the-shelf quadratic programming package. We conduct extensive simulation studies to show satisfactory risk control when maximizing the clinical benefit. Finally, we apply our method to a randomized trial of type 2 diabetes patients to guide optimal utilization of the first line insulin treatments based on individual patient characteristics while controlling for the rate of hypoglycemia events. We identify baseline glycated hemoglobin level, body mass index, and fasting blood glucose as three key factors among 18 biomarkers to differentiate treatment assignments, and demonstrate a successful control of the risk of hypoglycemia in both the training and testing dataset.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2014
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 : S14 - S80
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, ARTHRITIS RES THER
  • [3] Belle DJ, 2008, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V77, P1553
  • [4] DURAbility of Basal Versus Lispro Mix 75/25 Insulin Efficacy (DURABLE) Trial 24-Week Results Safety and efficacy of insulin lispro mix 75/25 versus insulin glargine added to oral antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Buse, John B.
    Woleeenbuttel, Bruce H. R.
    Herman, William H.
    Shemonsky, Natalie K.
    Jiang, Honghua H.
    Fahrbach, Jessie L.
    Scism-Bacon, Jamie L.
    Martin, Sherry A.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 (06) : 1007 - 1013
  • [5] Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections
    Cai, Tianxi
    Tian, Lu
    Wong, Peggy H.
    Wei, L. J.
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2011, 12 (02) : 270 - 282
  • [6] Hypoglycemia in diabetes
    Cryer, PE
    Davis, SN
    Shamoon, H
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (06) : 1902 - 1912
  • [7] Hypoglycaemia: The limiting factor in the glycaemic management of Type I and Type II Diabetes
    Cryer, PE
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2002, 45 (07) : 937 - 948
  • [8] Fahrbach Jessie, 2008, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V2, P831
  • [9] Fidler Carrie, 2011, J Med Econ, V14, P646, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2011.610852
  • [10] Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data
    Foster, Jared C.
    Taylor, Jeremy M. G.
    Ruberg, Stephen J.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (24) : 2867 - 2880