The Division of Child Care, Sexual Intimacy, and Relationship Quality in Couples

被引:51
作者
Carlson, Daniel L. [1 ]
Hanson, Sarah [1 ]
Fitzroy, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Sociol, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
parenting; child care; sexual intimacy; relationship quality; gender egalitarian; MARITAL SATISFACTION; FATHERS SHARE; HOUSEWORK; GENDER; LABOR; WORK; TIME; TRANSITION; PARENTS; MOTHERS;
D O I
10.1177/0891243215626709
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Increasingly, both mothers and fathers are expected to play an equal role in child rearing. Nonetheless, we know little about how child care arrangements affect couples' sexual intimacy and relationship quality. Research has focused on the effect of the division of paid labor and housework on couples' relationships, finding that egalitarianism is problematic for sexual intimacy, relationship quality, and relationship stability. These findings, however, come almost universally from studies utilizing decades-old data that fail to examine the division of child care. In this study, we update this work by utilizing data from the 2006 Marital and Relationship Study (N = 974) to examine how the division of child care affects the relationship quality and sexual intimacy of heterosexual couples in the United States. Results indicate that men's performance of child care is generally associated with more satisfaction with the division of child care, more satisfying sexual relationships, and higher quality relationships. Importantly, we find that egalitarian child care arrangements have positive consequences for both men and women. These findings contribute to a growing body of research that challenges the costs of egalitarianism and indicates instead that egalitarianism is associated with higher quality, more intimate relationships than gender traditional arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 466
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Acs G., 2003, Changes in family structure and child well-being: Evidence from the 2002 national survey of America's families
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MODERN PARENTHOOD RO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Fighting for time: shifting boundaries of work and social life
[4]   Men's work efforts and the transition to fatherhood [J].
Astone N.M. ;
Dariotis J.K. ;
Sonenstein F.L. ;
Pleck J.H. ;
Hynes K. .
Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2010, 31 (1) :3-13
[5]   Satisfaction with housework: Examining the paradox [J].
Baxter, J ;
Western, M .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 32 (01) :101-120
[6]  
Becker G., 1991, A treatise on the family
[7]   Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter? [J].
Bianchi, Suzanne M. ;
Sayer, Liana C. ;
Milkie, Melissa A. ;
Robinson, John P. .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2012, 91 (01) :55-63
[8]   The wage penalty for motherhood [J].
Budig, MJ ;
England, P .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 66 (02) :204-225
[9]   THE INCIDENCE AND FREQUENCY OF MARITAL SEX IN A NATIONAL SAMPLE [J].
CALL, V ;
SPRECHER, S ;
SCHWARTZ, P .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1995, 57 (03) :639-652
[10]  
Capizzano Jeffrey, 2000, URBAN I B, VB-7