Comparing spinal blockade effectiveness and maternal hemodynamics using 25 gauge and 29 gauge spinal needles with the same volumetric flow rate in patients undergoing caesarean section

被引:1
作者
Ciftci, Taner [1 ]
Daskaya, Hayrettin [2 ]
Efe, Serdar [3 ]
机构
[1] Dicle Univ, Med Fac, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Med Fac, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Trakya Univ, Med Fac, Dept Internal Med, Edirne, Turkey
关键词
Spinal anaesthesia; flow dynamics; caesarean section; pencil point needle; PREGNANT-WOMEN; ANESTHESIA; HYPOTENSION;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2017.1290055
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Spinal needles with different diameters can be used to prevent side effects in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia. However, the velocity of local anaesthetic changes through the spinal needle depending on the diameter of it. Local anaesthetic injection velocity has been reported to be associated with the spinal block level. We aimed to compare spinal needles of different diameters with the same local anaesthetic volumetric flow rate in terms of spinal blockade and hemodynamics in obstetric patients. Eighty-four patients received spinal anaesthesia by either a 25G needle or 29G with the same volumetric flow rate. Block levels, adverse effects, ephedrine given and a success rate of spinal anaesthesia were significantly higher in 25G than in 29G (p<.05). Athough the use of 29G was associated with a low level of block, a sufficient block level was generated for caesarean section. Furthermore, in spite of the technical difficulty, use of 29G was accompanied by a decreased incidence of maternal hypotension, bradycardia and a lowered ephedrine administration.Impact statementLocal spinal anaesthetic injections at faster flows cause turbulent flow leading to lower anaesthesia concentrations.The control of spinal anaesthesia levels has some difficulties due to anatomical repositioning, especially in pregnant patients.Also, it can cause frequent hemodynamic complications including hypotension and bradycardia, complications that may also have inadvertent effects on foetus.In this study, we showed that smaller diameter spinal needles provided safer spinal anaesthesia levels and a lower incidence of hemodynamic complications.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 722
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Gordon M, 2016, ANESTHESIA ANESTHESI
  • [2] Soft tissue anatomy within the vertebral canal in pregnant women
    Hirabayashi, Y
    Shimizu, R
    Fukuda, H
    Saitoh, K
    Igarashi, T
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (02) : 153 - 156
  • [3] Hyperbaric dye solution distribution characteristics after pencil-point needle injection in a spinal cord model
    Holman, SJ
    Robinson, RA
    Beardsley, D
    Stewart, SFC
    Klein, L
    Stevens, RA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (04) : 966 - 973
  • [4] Role of needle gauge and tip configuration in the production of lumbar puncture headache
    Lambert, DH
    Hurley, RJ
    Hertwig, L
    Datta, S
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1997, 22 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [5] PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF HYPOTENSION DURING CENTRAL NEURAL BLOCK
    MCCRAE, AF
    WILDSMITH, JAW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 (06) : 672 - 680
  • [6] Mercier FJ, 2013, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V79, P62
  • [7] Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis
    Reynolds, F
    Seed, PT
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 60 (07) : 636 - 653
  • [8] Flow dynamics through spinal needles
    Serpell, MG
    Gray, WM
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [9] SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - COMPARISON OF 22-GAUGE AND 25-GAUGE WHITACRE NEEDLES WITH 26-GAUGE QUINCKE NEEDLES
    SHUTT, LE
    VALENTINE, SJ
    WEE, MYK
    PAGE, RJ
    PROSSER, A
    THOMAS, TA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (06) : 589 - 594
  • [10] Compression of the subarachnoid space by the engorged epidural venous plexus in pregnant women
    Takiguchi, Tetsuo
    Yamaguchi, Shigeki
    Tezuka, Masatomo
    Furukawa, Naoki
    Kitajima, Toshimitsu
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (04) : 848 - 851