Can public access to documents support the transparency of automated decision-making? The European Union law perspective

被引:3
|
作者
Mazur, Joanna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Law & Adm, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Digital Econ Lab DELab, Warsaw, Poland
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2021年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
automated decision-making; General Data Protection Regulation; right to access public documents; right to access information; Regulation; 1049/2001; transparency; DATA PROTECTION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1093/ijlit/eaaa019
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Due to the concerns which are raised regarding the impact of automated decision-making (ADM) on transparency and their potential discriminatory character, it is worth examining the possibility of applying legal measures which could serve to increase transparency of ADM systems. The article explores the possibility to consider algorithms used in ADM systems as documents subjected to the right to access documents in European Union (EU) law. It is focused on contrasting and comparing the approach based on the right to access public documents developed by the Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU) with the approach to the right to access public information as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The analysis shows discrepancies in the perspectives presented by these Courts which result in a limited scope of the right to access public documents in EU law. Pointing out these differences may provide a motivation to clarify the meaning of the right to access information in EU law, the CJEU's approach remaining as for now incoherent. The article presents the arguments for and ways of bringing together the approaches of the CJEU and the ECtHR in the light of a decreasing level of transparency resulting from the use of ADM in the public sector. It shows that in order to ensure compliance with EU law, it is necessary to rethink the role which the right to access information plays in the human rights catalogue.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] The right of access in automated decision-making: The scope of article 15(1)(h) GDPR in theory and practice
    Casters, Bart
    Heijne, Anne -Sophie
    COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2022, 46
  • [32] Automating public administration: citizens' attitudes towards automated decision-making across Estonia, Sweden, and Germany
    Kaun, Anne
    Larsson, Anders Olof
    Masso, Anu
    INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2024, 27 (02) : 314 - 332
  • [33] AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings
    Kuziemski, Maciej
    Misuraca, Gianluca
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2020, 44 (06)
  • [34] Discretion, Automated Decision-Making and Public Values: Background and Test of an Approach for Unpacking Human and Technological Agency
    Ranerup, Agneta
    Svensson, Lupita
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, EGOV 2022, 2022, 13391 : 291 - 306
  • [35] OpenNotes and shared decision making: a growing practice in clinical transparency and how it can support patient-centered care
    Fossa, Alan J.
    Bell, Sigall K.
    DesRoches, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (09) : 1153 - 1159
  • [36] Automated decision-making, discretion and public values: a case study of two municipalities and their case management of social assistance
    Ranerup, Agneta
    Svensson, Lupita
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 26 (05) : 948 - 962
  • [37] Tree selection for a virtual urban park: Comparing aided and unaided decision-making to support public engagement in greenspace design
    Campbell-Arvai, Victoria
    Vergel, Ramiro Serrano
    Lindquist, Mark
    Fox, Nathan
    Van Berkel, Derek
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2024, 99
  • [38] Can women's self-help groups improve access to information, decision-making, and agricultural practices? The Indian case
    Raghunathan, Kalyani
    Kannan, Samyuktha
    Quisumbing, Agnes R.
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 50 (05) : 567 - 580
  • [39] Transparency in European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration Decision Making: Is It Possible to Identify the Rationale for Divergences in Approved Indication From Public Assessment Reports?
    Bujar, Magda
    Ferragu, Sara
    McAuslane, Neil
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Kuhler, Thomas C.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 43 (05) : 888 - 905