Ulnar nerve decompression and transposition with versus without supercharged end-to-side motor nerve transfer for advanced cubital tunnel syndrome: a randomized comparison study

被引:12
|
作者
Xie, Qing [1 ]
Shao, Xinzhong [1 ]
Song, Xiaoliang [2 ]
Wang, Fengyu [1 ]
Zhang, Xu [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Zhang, Zhemin [1 ]
Lyu, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Hand Surg, Affiliated Hosp 3, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Changzhi Second Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Changzhi, Shanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
cubital tunnel syndrome; CuTS; anterior interosseous nerve; ulnar motor nerve; decompression and anterior subfascial transposition; DAST; supercharged end-to-side; SETS; peripheral nerve; ANTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS NERVE; SUBMUSCULAR TRANSPOSITION; FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; HAND; NEURORRHAPHY; PREDICTORS; NEUROPATHY; STRENGTH; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.3171/2021.2.JNS203508
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare ulnar nerve decompression and anterior subfascial transposition with versus without supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve-to-ulnar motor nerve transfer for advanced cubital tunnel syndrome, to describe performing the nerve transfer through a small incision, and to investigate predictive factors for poor recovery following the procedure. METHODS Between January 2013 and October 2016, 93 patients were randomly allocated to a study group (n = 45) and a control group (n = 48). Patients in the study group were treated with supercharged motor nerve transfer via a 5- cm incision following decompression and anterior subfascial transposition. Patients in the control group were treated with decompression and anterior subfascial transposition alone. Postoperative pinch strength and compound muscle action potential amplitude (CMAPa) were assessed. Function of the limb was assessed based on the Gabel/Amadio scale. Between- group data were compared, and significance was set at p < 0.05. Potential risk factors were collected from demographic data and disease severity indicators. RESULTS At the final follow-up at 2 years, the results of the study group were superior to those of the control group with regard to postoperative pinch strength ( 75.13% +/- 7.65% vs 62.11% +/- 6.97%, p < 0.05); CMAPa of the first dorsal interossei (17.17 +/- 5.84 mV vs 12.20 +/- 4.09 mV, p < 0.01); CMAPa of abductor digiti minimi (11.57 +/- 4.04 mV vs 8.43 +/- 6.11 mV, p < 0.01); and excellent to good results (0.67 for the study group vs 0.35 for the control group, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the advanced age (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.25-4.10; p = 0.003) in the study group was related to unsatisfactory outcome in the patients. CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of advanced cubital tunnel syndrome, additional supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve- to-ulnar motor nerve transfer may produce a better function of the hand. The authors also found that cases in the elderly were related to unsatisfactory postoperative results for these patients and that they could be informed of the possibility of worsening surgery results.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 355
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Feasibility of a less invasive supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve to ulnar motor nerve transfer
    Tovar-Bazaga, Miguel
    Cervera-Irimia, Javier
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2024,
  • [2] Cubital tunnel syndrome.: Treatment by decompression without transposition of ulnar nerve
    Filippi, R
    Farag, S
    Reisch, R
    Grunert, P
    Böcher-Schwarz, H
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 45 (03) : 164 - 168
  • [3] Refining Indications for the Supercharge End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
    Power, Hollie A.
    Kahn, Lorna C.
    Patterson, Megan M.
    Yee, Andrew
    Moore, Amy M.
    Mackinnon, Susan E.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (01) : 106E - 116E
  • [4] Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: A prospective randomized study
    Gervasio, O
    Gambardella, G
    Zaccone, C
    Branca, D
    NEUROSURGERY, 2005, 56 (01) : 108 - 117
  • [5] Ulnar Nerve In Situ Decompression versus Transposition for Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Said, Joseph
    Van Nest, Duncan
    Foltz, Carol
    Ilyas, Asif M.
    JOURNAL OF HAND AND MICROSURGERY, 2019, 11 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [6] Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome
    Caputo, AE
    Watson, HK
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (03): : 544 - 551
  • [7] Decompression of the ulnar nerve and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision for cubital tunnel syndrome: Comparison with anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve
    Hahn, Soo Bong
    Choi, Yun Rak
    Kang, Ho Jung
    Kang, Eung Shick
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (07) : 1150 - 1155
  • [8] Supercharged End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer for Intrinsic Musculature Reinnervation
    Barbour, John
    Yee, Andrew
    Kahn, Lorna C.
    Mackinnon, Susan E.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 37A (10): : 2150 - 2159
  • [9] Regional Ulnar Nerve Strain Following Decompression and Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition in Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
    Foran, Ian
    Vaz, Kenneth
    Sikora-Klak, Jakub
    Ward, Samuel R.
    Hentzen, Eric R.
    Shah, Sameer B.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (10): : E343 - E350
  • [10] Clinical efficacy of simple decompression versus anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Hong-wei
    Ou, Shan
    Liu, Guo-dong
    Fei, Jun
    Zhao, Gang-sheng
    Wu, Li-jun
    Pan, Jun
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 126 : 150 - 155