Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study

被引:8
|
作者
Kucharzyk, Donald [1 ]
Colle, Kyle [2 ]
Boone, Christopher [3 ]
Araghi, Ali [4 ]
机构
[1] DK Orthoped, Crown Point, IN USA
[2] Reg Brain & Spine, Cape Girardeau, MO USA
[3] Proliance Orthopaed & Sports Med, 1231 116th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 USA
[4] CORE Inst, Sun City West, AZ USA
关键词
sacroiliac joint dysfunction; sacroiliac joint fusion; SI joint; SI joint arthrodesis; minimally invasive surgery; sacroiliac; fusion; arthrodesis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; EUROQOL;
D O I
10.14444/8185
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This report documents 1-year results of 250 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of a minimally invasive (MI) sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) system that uses decortication, graft placement, and joint fixation. Methods: The cohort includes all patients enrolled in the EVoluSIon (EVSI) clinical study who had MI SIJF surgery and completed 1-year follow-up. Average age at baseline was 60.5 years, and 70.8% were female. Sacroiliac (SI) joint-related pain duration was >= 2 years in 56% of patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) SI joint pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life, and opioid use were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year. Results: At 1 year, the mean VAS pain demonstrated a significant reduction of more than 43 points, from 76.4 at baseline to 33.0 (P < 0.0001), with 72.2% of patients attaining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID, >= 20-point improvement). Mean ODI scores also significantly improved from 54.4 at baseline to 30.5 at 1 year (P < 0.0001), with 62.5% of patients achieving the MCID (>= 15-point improvement). Prior to surgery. 62.7% (126/201) of patients were taking opioids or other narcotics, but by 1 year postsurgery. only 26.9% (54/201) of patients reported using these medications. representing a significant 57.1% decrease in narcotic/opioid use (P < 0.0001). Fusion of the SI joint was seen in 68.7% of patients. Few procedural complications were reported. In all, there were 8 (8/250) serious procedure-related events, including 1 device malposition observed on the day of surgery that required replacing the superior screw with a shorter screw. Conclusions: Analysis of patients treated with MI SIJF in the EVSI study demonstrated that the procedure can be performed safely and results in significant improvements in pain, quality of life. and opioid use at 1 year as well as causing fusion in the majority of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 175
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results
    Hermans, Sem M. M.
    Knoef, Rob J. H.
    Schuermans, Valerie N. E.
    Schotanus, Martijn G. M.
    Nellensteijn, Jorm M.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    Curfs, Inez
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hermans, Sem M. M.
    Droeghaag, Ruud
    Schotanus, Martijn G. M.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    Curfs, Inez
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (03) : 472 - 480
  • [33] Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
    Duhon, Bradley S.
    Cher, Daniel J. d
    Wine, Kathryn D.
    Lockstadt, Harry
    Kovalsky, Don
    Soo, Cheng-Lun
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2013, 6 (01) : 219 - 229
  • [34] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion Revision: A Technique Guide
    Cognetti, Daniel J.
    Jorgensen, Anton Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (02) : 274 - 279
  • [35] Minimally Invasive Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Cadaveric and Clinical Feasibility Study
    Taghva, Alexander
    Attenello, Frank J.
    Zada, Gabriel
    Khalessi, Alexander A.
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 80 (3-4) : 414 - 421
  • [36] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with Cylindrical Threaded Implants Using Intraoperative Stereotactic Navigation
    Rajpal, Sharad
    Burneikiene, Sigita
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E1588 - E1591
  • [37] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Are They Similarly Safe and Effective?
    Ledonio, Charles G. T.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    Swiontkowski, Marc F.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) : 1831 - 1838
  • [38] Minimally Invasive Postero-Inferior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Surgical Technique and Procedural Details
    Latif, Usman
    Hubbell III, Paul J.
    Tubic, Goran
    Guerrero, Luis A.
    Skaribas, Ioannis M.
    Block, Jon E.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [39] Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Minimally Affects Adjacent Lumbar Segment Motion: A Finite Element Study
    Lindsey, Derek P.
    Kiapour, Ali
    Yerby, Scott A.
    Goel, Vijay K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2015, 9
  • [40] Propensity-matched Analysis of 1062 Patients Following Minimally Invasive Versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Ballatori, Alexander M.
    Shahrestani, Shane
    Chen, Xiao T.
    Ton, Andy
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Buser, Zorica
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (08): : E477 - E482