On the thermal evolution of the Earth's core

The Earth's magnetic field is sustained by dynamo action in the fluid outer core. The energy sources available to the geodynamo are well established, but their relative importance remains uncertain. We focus on the issue of thermal versus compositional convection, which is inextricably coupled to the evolution of the core as the Earth cools. To investigate the effect of the various physical processes on this evolution, we develop models based on conservation of energy and the assumption that the core is well mixed by vigorous convection. We depart from previous numerical studies by developing an analytical model. The simple algebraic form of the solution affords insight into both the evolution of the core and the energy budget of the geodynamo. We also present a numerical model to compare with the quantitative predictions of our analytical model and find that the differences between the two are negligible. An important conclusion of this study is that thermal convection can contribute significantly to the geodynamo. In fact, a modest heat flux in excess of that conducted down the adiabatic gradient is sufficient to power the geodynamo, even in the absence of compositional convection and latent-heat release. The relative contributions of thermal and compositional convection to the dynamo are largely determined by the magnitude of the heat flux from the core and the inner-core radius. For a plausible current-day heat flux df Q = 3.0 x 10(12) W and the current inner-core radius, we find that compositional convection is responsible for approximately two thirds of the ohmic dissipation in the core and thermal convection for the remaining one third. The proportion of ohmic dissipation produced by thermal convection increases to 45% with an increase in Q to 6.0 x 10(12) W. In the early Earth, when the inner core was smaller and the heat flux probably greater than the present values, thermal convection would have been the dominant energy source for the dynamo. We also calculate the history of inner-core growth as a function of the heat flux. For example, the inner core would have grown to its present size in 2.8 x 10(9) years if the average heat flux was Q = 4.0 x 10(12) W. The model does not require the heat flux to be constant.