Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch

被引:110
作者
Hagoort, P
Wassenaar, M
Brown, CA
机构
[1] FC Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Nijmegen Inst Cognit & Informat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2003年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
language; syntactic processing; (L)AN; N400; P600/SPS; ERP;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00208-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In two studies subjects were required to read Dutch sentences that in some cases contained a syntactic violation, in other cases a semantic violation. All syntactic violations were word category violations. The design excluded differential contributions of expectancy to influence the syntactic violation effects. The syntactic violations elicited an Anterior Negativity between 300 and 500 ms. This negativity was bilateral and had a frontal distribution. Over posterior sites the same violations elicited a P600/SPS starting at about 600 ms. The semantic violations elicited an N400 effect. The topographic distribution of the AN was more frontal than the distribution of the classical N400 effect, indicating that the underlying generators of the AN and the N400 are, at least to a certain extent, non-overlapping. Experiment 2 partly replicated the design of Experiment 1, but with differences in rate of presentation and in the distribution of items over subjects, and without semantic violations. The word category violations resulted in the same effects as were observed in Experiment 1, showing that they were independent of some of the specific parameters of Experiment 1. The discussion presents a tentative account of the functional differences in the triggering conditions of the AN and the P600/SPS. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 50
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Ainsworth-Darnell, K ;
Shulman, HG ;
Boland, JE .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (01) :112-130
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COGNITIVE ELECTROPHY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NEUROCOGNITION LANGU, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198507932.003.0003, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198507932.003.0003]
[4]  
Baayen R. H., 1993, CELEX LEXICAL DATABA
[5]   THE PROCESSING NATURE OF THE N400 - EVIDENCE FROM MASKED PRIMING [J].
BROWN, C ;
HAGOORT, P .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (01) :34-44
[6]  
Brown C. M., 2000, NEW COGNITIVE NEUROS, P881
[7]   Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: Open- and closed-class words [J].
Brown, CM ;
Hagoort, P ;
ter Keurs, M .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 11 (03) :261-281
[8]   EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL COMPONENTS REFLECT PHONOLOGICAL AND SEMANTIC PROCESSING OF THE TERMINAL WORD OF SPOKEN SENTENCES [J].
CONNOLLY, JF ;
PHILLIPS, NA .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1994, 6 (03) :256-266
[9]   Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations [J].
Coulson, S ;
King, JW ;
Kutas, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1998, 13 (01) :21-58
[10]   Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context [J].
Federmeier, KD ;
Segal, JB ;
Lombrozo, T ;
Kutas, M .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :2552-2566