Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters

被引:459
作者
Lens, PNL [1 ]
Visser, A [1 ]
Janssen, AJH [1 ]
Pol, LWH [1 ]
Lettinga, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ Agr, Dept Environm Technol, NL-6700 EV Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
sulfate; sulfide; sulfate reduction; competition; sulfate-reducing bacteria; methane-producing bacteria; sulfur cycle; sulfide inhibition; sulfate reduction technology;
D O I
10.1080/10643389891254160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sulfate-rich wastewaters are generated by many industrial processes that use sulfuric acid or sulfate-rich feed stocks (e.g., fermentation or sea food processing industry). Also, the use of reduced sulfur compounds in industry, that is, sulfide (tanneries, kraft pulping), sulfite (sulfite pulping), or thiosulfate (pulp bleaching, fixing of photographs), contaminates wastewaters with sulfate. A major problem for the biological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters is the production of H(2)S. Gaseous and dissolved sulfides cause physical (corrosion, odor, increased effluent GOD) or biological (toxicity) constraints that may lead to process failure. H(2)S is generated by sulfate-reducing bacteria, in both anaerobic and aerobic (anoxic microenvironments) wastewater treatment systems. No practical methods exist to prevent sulfate reduction. Selective inhibition of SRB by molybdate, transition elements, or antibiotics is unsuccessful at full scale. Selection of a treatment strategy for a sulfate-rich wastewater depends on the aim of the treatment. This can be (1) removal of organic matter, (2) removal of sulfate, or (3) removal of both. Theoretically, wastewaters with a COD/sulfate ratio of 0.67 or higher contain enough COD (electron donor) to remove all sulfate by sulfate-reducing bacteria. If the ratio is lower, addition of extra GOD, for example, as ethanol or synthesis gas (a mixture of H(2), CO(2), and CO) is required. Complete COD removal in wastewaters with a COD/sulfate ratio of above 0.67 also requires methanogenic COD degradation. Methods to reduce sulfide toxicity and to allow optimal COD removal are presented. Sulfate can be removed from the wastestream by the coupling of a sulfide oxidation step to the sulfate reduction step. Sulfur can be recovered from the wastewater in case H(2)S is partially oxidized to insoluble elemental sulfur.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 88
页数:48
相关论文
共 230 条
  • [1] SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE EVALUATION OF ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR BIOFILM
    ALLEMAN, JE
    VEIL, JA
    CANADAY, JT
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1982, 16 (05) : 543 - 550
  • [2] ALPHENAAR PA, 1993, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V43, P249, DOI 10.1016/0960-8524(93)90038-D
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, CRITICAL REV ENV SCI, DOI DOI 10.1080/10643389891254188
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1988, BIOL ANAEROBIC MICRO
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1988, Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms. Dissimilatory Reduction of Sulfur Compounds
  • [6] MECHANISM AND FAVORABLE OPERATING-CONDITIONS OF ORGANIC SUBSTRATE REMOVAL IN MICROAEROPHILIC UPFLOW SLUDGE BED REACTOR (MUSB)
    ARORA, S
    MINO, T
    MATSUO, T
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1995, 29 (08) : 1895 - 1901
  • [7] EFFECT OF HIGH SULFITE CONTENTS ON ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION OF RAISIN-FINISHING WASTE-WATER
    ATHANASSOPOULOS, N
    KOUINIS, J
    PAPADIMITRIOU, A
    KOUTINAS, AA
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL WASTES, 1989, 30 (01): : 53 - 60
  • [8] Acidity of effluent from inert gas systems using seawater scrubbing
    Baalina, A
    Rodriguez, E
    Santaballa, JA
    Arce, A
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 17 (03) : 331 - 335
  • [9] BAILEY DG, 1983, P 38 IND WAST C PURD, P673
  • [10] BARNES LJ, 1991, T I METALL C, V101, pC183