Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Minimization Analysis of Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

被引:3
作者
Arrieta, Oscar [1 ,2 ]
Munoz-Montano, Wendy [2 ]
Muniz-Hernandez, Sae [1 ]
Campos, Saul [3 ]
Catalan, Rodrigo [1 ,2 ]
Soto-Molina, Herman [4 ]
Guzman Vazquez, Silvia [4 ]
Diaz-Alvarez, Osvaldo [4 ]
Martinez-Pacheco, Victor [4 ]
Turcott, Jenny G. [1 ]
Ramos-Ramirez, Maritza [1 ,2 ]
Cabrera-Miranda, Luis [1 ,2 ]
Barron, Feliciano [1 ,2 ]
Cardona, Andres F. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Lab Personalized Med, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Thorac Oncol Unit, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] ISSEMYM, Dept Med Oncol, Toluca, Mexico
[4] AMETSA, Dept Econ Evaluat, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Fdn Clin & Appl Canc Res FICMAC, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Clin Country, Clin & Translat Oncol Grp, Bogota, Colombia
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
pleural mesothelioma; prolonged gemcitabine infusion; low-dose gemcitabine; cisplatin; chemotherapy; cost minimization analysis; VERSION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.641975
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is rare and aggressive neoplasia, with a poor prognosis; furthermore, the monetary cost of its treatment represents a major challenge for many patients. The economic burden this malignancy imposes is underscored by the fact that asbestos exposure, which is the most frequent risk factor, is much more prevalent in the lower socioeconomic population of developing countries. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of continuous infusion of low-dose Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin (CIGC) as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable MPM. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study to determine efficacy and safety of continuous infusion gemcitabine at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in a 6-h continuous infusion plus cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in patients with unresectable MPM. We also performed a cost-minimization analysis to determine if this chemotherapy regimen is less expensive than other currently used regimens. Results The median number of chemotherapy cycles was six (range 1-11 cycles); objective response rate was documented in 46.2%, and disease control rate was seen in 81.2%. Median PFS was 8.05 months (CI 95% 6.97-9.13); median OS was 16.16 months (CI 95% 12.5-19.9). The cost minimization analysis revealed savings of 66.4, 61.9, and 97.7% comparing CIGC with short-infusion gemcitabine plus cisplatin (SIGC), cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP), and cisplatin plus pemetrexed and bevacizumab (CPB), respectively. Furthermore, this chemotherapy regimen proved to be safe at the administered dosage. Conclusion CIGC is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with unresectable MPM; besides, this combination is a cost-saving option when compared with other frequently used chemotherapy schemes. Therefore, this treatment scheme should be strongly considered for patients with unresectable MPM and limited economic resources.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Case-Control Study of Pleural Mesothelioma in Workers With Social Security in Mexico [J].
Aguilar-Madrid, Guadalupe ;
Robles-Perez, Eduardo ;
Arturo Juarez-Perez, Cuauhtemoc ;
Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel ;
Gerardo Rico-Mendez, Flavio ;
Javier, Kelly-Garcia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2010, 53 (03) :241-251
[2]   A phase II trial of prolonged, continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma [J].
Arrieta, Oscar ;
Lopez-Macias, Diego ;
Mendoza-Garcia, Victor-Osvaldo ;
Bacon-Fonseca, Ludwing ;
Munoz-Montano, Wendy ;
Macedo-Perez, Eleazar-Omar ;
Muniz-Hernandez, Sae ;
Blake-Cerda, Monika ;
Corona-Cruz, Jose-Francisco .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 73 (05) :975-982
[3]   First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial [J].
Baas, Paul ;
Scherpereel, Arnaud ;
Nowak, Anna K. ;
Fujimoto, Nobukazu ;
Peters, Solange ;
Tsao, Anne S. ;
Mansfield, Aaron S. ;
Popat, Sanjay ;
Jahan, Thierry ;
Antonia, Scott ;
Oulkhouir, Youssef ;
Bautista, Yolanda ;
Cornelissen, Robin ;
Greillier, Laurent ;
Grossi, Francesco ;
Kowalski, Dariusz ;
Rodriguez-Cid, Jeronimo ;
Aanur, Praveen ;
Oukessou, Abderrahim ;
Baudelet, Christine ;
Zalcman, Gerard .
LANCET, 2021, 397 (10272) :375-386
[4]   Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update on investigation, diagnosis and treatment [J].
Bibby, Anna C. ;
Tsim, Selina ;
Kanellakis, Nikolaos ;
Ball, Hannah ;
Talbot, Denis C. ;
Blyth, Kevin G. ;
Maskell, Nick A. ;
Psallidas, Ioannis .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2016, 25 (142) :472-486
[5]   Costs of medical care for mesothelioma [J].
Borrelli, Eric ;
Babcock, Zachary ;
Kogut, Stephen .
RARE TUMORS, 2019, 11
[6]   Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma [J].
Byrne, MJ ;
Nowak, AK .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (02) :257-260
[7]   Cisplatin and gemcitabine treatment for malignant mesothelioma: A phase II study [J].
Byrne, MJ ;
Davidson, JA ;
Musk, AW ;
Dewar, J ;
van Hazel, G ;
Buck, M ;
de Klerk, NH ;
Robinson, BWS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :25-30
[8]   Can the Spanish care system assume the new costs of medications against cancer? [J].
Camps, Carlos ;
Caballero, Cristina ;
Sirera, Rafael ;
Blasco, Ana ;
Cayuela, Diego ;
Gil, Mireia ;
Badia, Xavier .
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (02) :96-101
[9]   Emerging Treatments for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Where Are We Heading? [J].
Cantini, Luca ;
Hassan, Raffit ;
Sterman, Daniel H. ;
Aerts, Joachim G. J. V. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
[10]   Cisplatin and gemcitabine in malignant pleural mesothelioma: A phase II study [J].
Castagneto, B ;
Zai, S ;
Dongiovanni, D ;
Muzio, A ;
Bretti, S ;
Numico, G ;
Botta, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (03) :223-226