A new framework for small drinking water plant sustainability support and decision-making

被引:12
作者
Jones, Christopher H. [1 ]
Meyer, John [1 ,2 ]
Cornejo, Pablo K. [3 ]
Hogrewe, William [4 ]
Seidel, Chad J. [1 ,5 ]
Cook, Sherri M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Carollo Engn Inc, Walnut Creek, CA USA
[3] Calif State Univ Chico, Dept Civil Engn, Chico, CA 95929 USA
[4] Rural Community Assistance Partnership, Washington, DC USA
[5] Corona Environm Consulting LLC, Rockland, MA USA
关键词
Small utilities; Decision-making framework; Rural communities; Stakeholder involvement; MCDA; LCA; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA; TOOL; TECHNOLOGIES; OPTIMIZATION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133899
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public drinking water system decisions about treatment processes are becoming more challenging, especially as regulations become more stringent and source water quality degrades. For small systems that serve <10,000 people, treatment decisions are particularly difficult due to limited resources and because they do not currently have resources to help them make informed and sustainable decisions using environmental, social, and economic criteria. Therefore, a user-friendly sustainability assessment framework, which compares treatment processes relevant to a wide variety of small drinking water systems, was constructed. In summary, the framework uses life cycle assessment and multiple-criteria decision analysis to comprehensively evaluate twelve decision criteria, developed specific to small drinking water systems; the framework then uses an aggregation approach to identify and navigate multiple trade-offs and make a final recommendation based on stakeholder values. Four hypothetical scenarios were examined to show the framework's applicability to diverse small systems, ability to help stakeholders navigate trade-offs, and engineering relevance. The framework is universal in its capacity to evaluate systems with different design parameters, source waters, treatment criteria, and stakeholder preferences. (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Edwards M, 1997, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V89, P78
  • [12] Fuller S.K., 1996, NIST HDB, V135, DOI [10.1108/eb006413, DOI 10.1108/EB006413]
  • [13] Gimbel R., 2006, RECENT PROGR SLOW SA
  • [14] ASTA - A method for multi-criteria evaluation of water supply technologies to Assess the most SusTainable Alternative for Copenhagen
    Godskesen, B.
    Hauschild, M.
    Albrechtsen, H. -J.
    Rygaard, M.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 618 : 399 - 408
  • [15] Life Cycle Assessment of water treatment: what is the contribution of infrastructure and operation at unit process level?
    Igos, Elorri
    Dalle, Alice
    Tiruta-Barna, Ligia
    Benetto, Enrico
    Baudin, Isabelle
    Mery, Yoann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 65 : 424 - 431
  • [16] Multidimensional detective
    Inselberg, A
    [J]. IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION VISUALIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 100 - 107
  • [17] ISO, 2020, ISO 14040:2006/Amd1:2020 Environmental managementlife cycle assessmentprinciples and framework
  • [18] IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology
    Jolliet, O
    Margni, M
    Charles, R
    Humbert, S
    Payet, J
    Rebitzer, G
    Rosenbaum, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (06) : 324 - 330
  • [19] Jones CH, 2018, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V4, P1464, DOI [10.1039/c8ew00272j, 10.1039/C8EW00272J]
  • [20] Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Disinfection Technologies Used in Small Drinking Water Systems
    Jones, Christopher H.
    Shilling, Elizabeth G.
    Linden, Karl G.
    Cook, Sherri M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (05) : 2998 - 3007