Comparison of mango genomic DNA isolation methods for next generation sequencing

被引:0
作者
Sharma, Nimisha [1 ]
Singh, A. K. [1 ]
Srivastav, Manish [1 ]
Singh, B. P. [1 ]
Mahto, A. K. [1 ]
Singh, N. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Fruits & Hort Technol, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
DNA extraction; ddRAD sequencing; Mangifera indica L;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Six different methods of DNA isolation namely, CTAB, CTAB with PVP, Qiagene DNA extraction Mini and Maxi kits, CTAB with addition of PVP and purification using PCI followed by Qiagen Genomic-tip 500/G were compared for recovery of quality DNA from mango leaves. The higher yield (1375.0 ng/ mu l) of good quality (A(260/280) and A(260/230) 1.80 & 1.90, respectively) DNA was obtained with modified CTAB method with addition of PVP (MW, 40,000) followed by purification using phenol: chloroform: isoamylalcohol 25:24:1 and Qiagen Genomic-tip 500/G as compared to standard CTAB method (1096.50 ng/ mu l; A(260/280) and A(260/230) 1.40 and & 1.10, respectively). The DNA obtained using modified CTAB method was found suitable for PCR, PacBio, ddRAD sequencing and long-term storage.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 263
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Comparison of three genomic DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from maize [J].
Abdel-Latif, Amani ;
Osman, Gamal .
PLANT METHODS, 2017, 13
[12]   Comparison of three genomic DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from maize [J].
Amani Abdel-Latif ;
Gamal Osman .
Plant Methods, 13
[13]   Isolation of genomic DNA from wild species of Kuwaiti flora using different extraction methods [J].
Malallah, Ghanima A. ;
Montasser, Magdy S. ;
Pariyani, Smitha .
KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2006, 33 (01) :33-51
[14]   Two efficient methods for isolation of high-quality genomic DNA from entomopathogenic fungi [J].
Maria G, Serna-Dominguez ;
Gilda Y, Andrade-Michel ;
Hugo C, Arredondo-Bernal ;
Adrien, Gallou .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 148 :55-63
[15]   Standardization of the preanalytical phase of DNA extraction from fixed tissue for next-generation sequencing analyses [J].
Kofanova, Olga ;
Bellora, Camille ;
Frasquilho, Sonia Garcia ;
Antunes, Laurent ;
Hamot, Gael ;
Mathay, Conny ;
Mommaerts, Kathleen ;
Muller, Arnaud ;
DeWitt, Brian ;
Betsou, Fay .
NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 :52-61
[16]   Challenges of next-generation sequencing targeting anaerobes [J].
Conrads, Georg ;
Abdelbary, Mohamed M. H. .
ANAEROBE, 2019, 58 :47-52
[17]   Comparison of different collection procedures and two methods for DNA isolation from saliva [J].
Durdiakova, Jaroslava ;
Kamodyova, Natalia ;
Ostatnikova, Daniela ;
Vlkova, Barbora ;
Celec, Peter .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 50 (04) :643-647
[18]   Comparison of different methods for the isolation and purification of total community DNA from soil [J].
Krsek, M ;
Wellington, EMH .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 39 (01) :1-16
[19]   Comparison of five methods for extraction of genomic DNA from a marine Archaea, Pyrococcus furiosus [J].
Mirmohammadsadeghi, Hamid ;
Abedi, Daryoush ;
Mohmoudpour, Hamid Reza ;
Akbari, Vajihe .
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 29 :390-394
[20]   Comparison of Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction Methods from Food Enrichment Broth Samples [J].
Cheng Yan ;
Yang Yong ;
Qin Dan ;
Zhou Xiaoping .
ISBE 2011: 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICINE AND ENGINEERING, VOL 2, 2011, :249-252