Social Work Knowledge Production and Utilisation: An International Comparison

被引:17
作者
Kreisberg, Nicole [1 ]
Marsh, Jeanne C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Sch Social Serv Adm, 969 E 60th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Knowledge development; utilisation; exchange; innovation; international comparison; PUBLICATIONS; JOURNALS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1093/bjsw/bcu147
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The social work profession has a long-standing commitment to social innovation and to the production and utilisation of knowledge to improve social work processes, practices and social welfare policy. To extend understanding of knowledge production and utilisation in social work, this study compares the most highly cited US and European social work articles in their contributions to a cumulative body of research and scholarship that is contributing to knowledge development and innovation in the field. One hundred highly cited English-language articles were analysed from a previous study: sixty-nine US articles andthirty-one European articles. To assess the types of knowledge social work readers and writers find most important, the articles were first classified by content. They then were categorised into non-research or research articles, with the research articles further delineated by their potential contribution to practice decision making. The results show the majority of European articles are about the profession of social work itself or theory while US articles report widely on populations, research and intervention effectiveness. The majority of articles in Europeare non-research articles, where as the majority of articles in the USA are research articles. Among research and non-research articles, 15 per cent of US articles report on intervention effectiveness, while 3 per cent of European articles report on intervention effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 618
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Action Research on Social Work Knowledge Creation and Dissemination from the Global South [J].
Pawar, Manohar .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2015, 45 (04) :1357-1364
[32]   The Cultivation of Social Work Knowledge: Toward a More Robust System of Peer Review [J].
Dunleavy, Daniel J. .
FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SERVICES, 2021, 102 (04) :556-568
[33]   Between relevance and excellence? Research impact agenda and the production of policy knowledge [J].
Bandola-Gill, Justyna .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2019, 46 (06) :895-905
[34]   Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans [J].
Nel, Jeanne L. ;
Roux, Dirk J. ;
Driver, Amanda ;
Hill, Liesl ;
Maherry, Ashton C. ;
Snaddon, Kate ;
Petersen, Chantel R. ;
Smith-Adao, Lindie B. ;
Van Deventer, Heidi ;
Reyers, Belinda .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) :176-188
[36]   The Mount Sinai international enhancement of social work leadership program: The past and the future [J].
Gordon, Elisa ;
Green, Karen ;
Whitwam, Louisa ;
Epstein, Irwin ;
Bernstein, Susan .
SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 57 (06) :406-421
[37]   Applying transdisciplinary sustainability transitions research in international social work doctoral training [J].
Matthies, Aila-Leena ;
Hermans, Koen ;
Leskosek, Vesna .
SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2022, 41 (07) :1541-1559
[39]   Credibility by automation: Expectations of future knowledge production in social media analytics [J].
Paakkonen, Juho ;
Laaksonen, SaIIa-Maaria ;
Jauho, Mikko .
CONVERGENCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH INTO NEW MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 26 (04) :790-807
[40]   Factors enhancing the level of utilisation of research knowledge on ecosystems [J].
Eschen, Rene ;
Mbaabu, Purity Rima ;
Ramamonjisoa, Bruno Salomon ;
Robledo-Abad, Carmenza .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07)