Research can be integrated into public health policy-making: global lessons for and from Spanish economic evaluations

被引:2
作者
Trapero-Bertran, Marta [1 ]
Pokhrel, Subhash [2 ]
Hanney, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Basic Sci Dept, Patients Inst, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Brunel Univ London, Dept Hlth Sci, Hlth Econ Res Grp, London, England
关键词
Public health; Policy-making; Economic evaluation; Knowledge translation; Research impact; Sustainable Development Goals; Tobacco control; COVID-19; Horizon Europe; Return on investment; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-022-00875-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
WHO promotes the use of research in policy-making to drive improvements in health, including in achieving Sustainable Development Goals such as tobacco control. The European Union's new euro95 billion Horizon Europe research framework programme parallels these aims, and also includes commitments to fund economic evaluations. However, researchers often express frustration at the perceived lack of attention to scientific evidence during policy-making. For example, some researchers claim that evidence regarding the return on investment from optimal implementation of evidence-based policies is frequently overlooked. An increasingly large body of literature acknowledges inevitable barriers to research use, but also analyses facilitators encouraging such use. This opinion piece describes how some research is integrated into policy-making. It highlights two recent reviews. One examines impact assessments of 36 multi-project research programmes and identifies three characteristics of projects more likely to influence policy-making. These include a focus on healthcare system needs, engagement of stakeholders, and research conducted for organizations supported by structures to receive and use evidence. The second review suggests that such characteristics are likely to occur as part of a comprehensive national health research system strategy, especially one integrated into the healthcare system. We also describe two policy-informing economic evaluations conducted in Spain. These examined the most cost-effective package of evidence-based tobacco control interventions and the cost-effectiveness of different strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer. Both projects focused on issues of healthcare concern and involved considerable stakeholder engagement. The Spanish examples reinforce some lessons from the global literature and, therefore, could help demonstrate to authorities in Spain the value of developing comprehensive health research systems, possibly following the interfaces and receptor model. The aim of this would be to integrate needs assessment and stakeholder engagement with structures spanning the research and health systems. In such structures, economic evaluation evidence could be collated, analysed by experts in relation to healthcare needs, and fed into both policy-making as appropriate, and future research calls. The increasingly large local and global evidence base on research utilization could inform detailed implementation of this approach once accepted as politically desirable. Given the COVID-19 pandemic, increasing the cost-effectiveness of healthcare systems and return on investment of public health interventions becomes even more important.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]   Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: a scoping review [J].
Jakobsen, Mette Winge ;
Karlsson, Leena Eklund ;
Skovgaard, Thomas ;
Aro, Arja R. .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (01)
[32]  
Kogan M, 2006, HIGH EDUC DYNAM, V11, P1, DOI 10.1007/1-4020-4446-1
[33]  
Kogan M., 1983, Government and Research: The Rothschild Experiment in a Government Department
[34]   Domains and processes for institutionalizing evidence-informed health policy-making: a critical interpretive synthesis [J].
Kuchenmueller, Tanja ;
Boeira, Laura ;
Oliver, Sandy ;
Moat, Kaelan ;
El-Jardali, Fadi ;
Barreto, Jorge ;
Lavis, John .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)
[35]   Making evidence and policy in public health emergencies: lessons from COVID-19 for adaptive evidence-making and intervention [J].
Lancaster, Kari ;
Rhodes, Tim ;
Rosengarten, Marsha .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2020, 16 (03) :477-490
[36]  
Leon Salas B, 2018, SEGURIDAD EFECTIVID
[37]   Political and Institutional Influences on the Use of Evidence in Public Health Policy. A Systematic Review [J].
Liverani, Marco ;
Hawkins, Benjamin ;
Parkhurst, Justin O. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10)
[38]   Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation [J].
Lomas, J .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2000, 19 (03) :236-240
[39]   Identifying priority technical and context-specific issues in improving the conduct, reporting and use of health economic evaluation in low-and middle-income countries [J].
Luz, Alia ;
Santatiwongchai, Benjarin ;
Pattanaphesaj, Juntana ;
Teerawattananon, Yot .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
[40]   Policy options for strengthening evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: overall SASHA project findings [J].
Majdzadeh, Reza ;
Sajadi, Haniye Sadat ;
Yazdizadeh, Bahareh ;
Doshmangir, Leila ;
Ehsani-Chimeh, Elham ;
Mahdavi, Mahdi ;
Mehrdad, Neda ;
Lavis, John ;
Nikooee, Sima ;
Mohtasham, Farideh ;
Mohseni, Mahsa ;
Akbari, Paria ;
Asgardoon, Mohammad Hossein ;
Rezaei, Niloofar ;
Neyazi, Narges ;
Ghaffarifar, Saeideh ;
Haghdoost, Ali Akbar ;
Khodayari-Zarnaq, Rahim ;
Mosadeghrad, Ali Mohammad ;
Pourabbasi, Ata ;
Rafinejad, Javad ;
Toyserkanamanesh, Reza .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)