Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes

被引:140
作者
Yim, Ga Won [1 ]
Jung, Yong Wook [1 ]
Paek, Jiheum [1 ]
Lee, San Hui [1 ]
Kwon, Ha Yan [1 ]
Nam, Eun Ji [1 ]
Kim, Sunghoon [1 ]
Kim, Jae Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Young Tae [1 ]
Kim, Sang Wun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Womens Canc Clin, Severance Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol,Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Coll Med, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
hysterectomy; laparoscopy; pain; single-port access; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; TRIAL; SURGERY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare surgical outcomes and postoperative pain between transumbilical single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPA-TLH) and conventional 4-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 157 patients who underwent SPA-TLH (n = 52) or conventional TLH (n = 105). A single-port access system consisted of a wound retractor, surgical glove, 2 5 mm trocars, and 1 10/11 mm trocar. RESULTS: The SPA-TLH group had less intraoperative blood loss (P < .001), shorter hospital stay (P < .001), and earlier diet intake (P < .001) compared with the conventional TLH group. There was no difference in perioperative complications. Immediate postoperative pain score was lower in the SPA-TLH group (P < .001). Postoperative pain after 6 and 24 hours was lower in SPA-TLH with marginal statistical significance. CONCLUSION: SPA-TLH is a feasible method for hysterectomy with lower immediate postoperative pain and better surgical outcomes with respect to recovery time compared with conventional TLH.
引用
收藏
页码:26.e1 / 26.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture [J].
Ates, Oguz ;
Hakguder, Gulce ;
Olguner, Mustafa ;
Akgur, Feza M. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2007, 42 (06) :1071-1074
[2]   Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy - A randomized double-blind controlled study [J].
Bisgaard, T ;
Klarskov, B ;
Trap, R ;
Kehlet, H ;
Rosenberg, J .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (04) :340-344
[3]   Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach [J].
Hagen, M. E. ;
Wagner, O. J. ;
Christen, D. ;
Morel, P. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (07) :581-583
[4]   Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease [J].
Johnson, N. ;
Barlow, D. ;
Lethaby, A. ;
Tavender, E. ;
Curr, E. ;
Garry, R. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02)
[5]   Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: Initial experience [J].
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Haber, George-Pascal ;
Goel, Raj K. ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Aron, Monish ;
Rackley, Raymond R. ;
Moore, Courtenay ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (01) :3-6
[6]   Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: A systematic review [J].
Kluivers, Kirsten B. ;
Johnson, Neil P. ;
Chien, Patrick ;
Vierhout, Mark E. ;
Bongers, MarliesY ;
Mol, Ben W. J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2008, 136 (01) :3-8
[7]   Single-Port Access Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Novel Method with a Wound Retractor and a Glove [J].
Lee, Yoo-Young ;
Kim, Tae-Joong ;
Kim, Chul Jung ;
Kang, Heeseok ;
Choi, Chel Hun ;
Lee, Jeong-Won ;
Kim, Byoung-Gie ;
Lee, Je-Ho ;
Bae, Duk-Soo .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (04) :450-453
[8]   Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Leggett, PL ;
Churchman-Winn, R ;
Miller, G .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (01) :32-36
[9]  
Pelosi M A, 1991, N J Med, V88, P721
[10]  
PELOSI MA, 1992, J REPROD MED, V37, P588