Navigating multiple contexts to integrate system transformation programs

被引:15
作者
Bos-de Vos, Marina [1 ]
Deken, Fleur [2 ]
Kleinsmann, Maaike [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Design Org & Strategy, Fac Ind Design Engn, Landbergstr 15, NL-2628 CE Delft, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, KIN Ctr Digital Innovat, Sch Business & Econ, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Transformation programs; Interorganizational collaboration; Program embeddedness; Healthcare transformation; Program-parent integration; PROJECT CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; TEMPORARY; COMPLEXITY; STRATEGIES; NETWORKS; CREATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper unpacks how actors navigate the multiple organizational, interorganizational and industry contexts that are associated with system transformation programs for addressing wicked, societal problems. Because system transformation programs can only succeed when changes are implemented by multiple organizations, an increased understanding of integrating programs in multiple contexts is needed. We draw on a qualitative field study of an interorganizational program designed to help transform the Dutch healthcare system. We identified three practices of context navigation that actors used to integrate the program into multiple parent organizations and address emerging incongruencies among contexts. These are aligning contexts, prioritizing contexts, and adding contexts. Over time, these navigating practices promoted progress towards program objectives via multiple parallel collaborative paths. Our findings shed new light on the role of breakdowns and decoupled collaborative paths in programs oriented at contributing to system transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 311
页数:22
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Something old, something new: Path dependence and path creation during the early stage of a project [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Ahola, Tuomas ;
Artto, Karlos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (05) :749-762
[2]   Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view [J].
Artto, Karlos ;
Martinsuo, Miia ;
Gemuendne, Hans Georg ;
Murtoaro, Jarkko .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (01) :1-18
[3]   Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations [J].
Bechky, BA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (01) :3-21
[4]   Composing qualitative process research [J].
Berends, Hans ;
Deken, Fleur .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2021, 19 (01) :134-146
[5]   Network Ethnography: A Mixed-Method Approach for the Study of Practices in Interorganizational Settings [J].
Berthod, Olivier ;
Grothe-Hammer, Michael ;
Sydow, Joerg .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2017, 20 (02) :299-323
[6]   Enhancing value capture by managing risks of value slippage in and across projects [J].
Bos-de Vos, Marina ;
Volker, Leentje ;
Wamelink, Hans .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 37 (05) :767-783
[7]   Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits [J].
Dille, Therese ;
Soderlund, Jonas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (04) :480-490
[8]  
Emerson RobertM., 1995, WRITING ETHNOGRAPHIC
[9]   No project is an island: linking projects to history and context [J].
Engwall, M .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (05) :789-808
[10]  
Evered R., 1981, Academy of Management Review, V6, P385, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1981.4285776