Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses

被引:52
作者
Gridelli, C [1 ]
Frontini, L
Perrone, F
Gallo, C
Gulisano, M
Cigolari, S
Castiglione, F
Robbiati, SF
Gasparini, G
Ianniello, GP
Farris, A
Locatelli, MC
Felletti, R
Piazza, E
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Tumori, Naples, Italy
[2] Osped San Paolo, Milan, Italy
[3] Osped S Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
[4] Univ Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
[5] Osped Civile, Alba, CN, Italy
[6] Osped Civile, Day Hosp Oncol, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[7] Osped Riuniti Bergamo, Reggio Di Calabria, Italy
[8] Univ Sassari, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[9] Osped S Carlo, Milan, Italy
[10] Osped San Martino Genova, Genoa, Italy
[11] Osped L Sacco, Milan, Italy
[12] Policlin San Matteo, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[13] Osped S Giovanni Ant Sede, Turin, Italy
[14] Osped Cardarelli, Campobasso, Italy
[15] Ist Nazl Tumori, Clin Controllate, Naples, Italy
[16] Univ Naples 2, Epidemiol Clin, Naples, Italy
关键词
gemcitabine; vinorelbine; non-small cell lung cancer;
D O I
10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(-2)). level I = 1000/25; level II =1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18-34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28-40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing. (C) 2000 Cancer Research Campaign.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 714
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   SURVIVAL DETERMINANTS IN EXTENSIVE-STAGE NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - THE SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP EXPERIENCE [J].
ALBAIN, KS ;
CROWLEY, JJ ;
LEBLANC, M ;
LIVINGSTON, RB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (09) :1618-1626
[3]  
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[4]   THE EORTC QLQ-LC13 - A MODULAR SUPPLEMENT TO THE EORTC CORE QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE (QLQ-C30) FOR USE IN LUNG-CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BERGMAN, B ;
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
KAASA, S ;
SULLIVAN, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (05) :635-642
[5]  
CHEN YM, 1999, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V18, pA481
[6]   VINORELBINE VERSUS VINORELBINE PLUS CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
DEPIERRE, A ;
CHASTANG, C ;
QUOIX, E ;
LEBEAU, B ;
BLANCHON, F ;
PAILLOT, N ;
LEMARIE, E ;
MILLERON, B ;
MORO, D ;
CLAVIER, J ;
HERMAN, D ;
TUCHAIS, E ;
JACOULET, P ;
BRECHOT, JM ;
CORDIER, JF ;
SOLALCELIGNY, P ;
BADRI, N ;
BESENVAL, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (01) :37-42
[7]  
Feliu J, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P1463, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991015)86:8<1463::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-N
[9]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL WITH MITOMYCIN-C IFOSFAMIDE VERSUS MITOMYCIN-C VINDESINE VERSUS CISPLATIN ETOPOSIDE IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
GATZEMEIER, U ;
HECKMAYR, M ;
HOSSFELD, DK ;
KAUKEL, E ;
KOSCHEL, G ;
NEUHAUSS, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 14 (05) :405-411
[10]   Front-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with docetaxel and gemcitabine: A multicenter phase II trial [J].
Georgoulias, V ;
Kouroussis, C ;
Androulakis, N ;
Kakolyris, S ;
Dimopoulos, MA ;
Papadakis, E ;
Bouros, D ;
Apostolopoulou, F ;
Papadimitriou, C ;
Agelidou, A ;
Hatzakis, K ;
Kalbakis, K ;
Kotsakis, A ;
Vardakis, N ;
Vlachonicolis, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) :914-920