Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Neurography for Parapharyngeal Schwannomas: Preoperative Determination of the Originating Nerves

被引:0
作者
Kitazume, Yoshio [1 ]
Ohashi, Isamu [1 ]
Katayama, Takashi [2 ]
Tsunoda, Atsunobu [3 ]
Kishimoto, Seiji [4 ]
Negi, Mariko [5 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
[2] Omori Red Cross Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
[4] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
[5] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ Hosp, Dept Human Pathol, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
关键词
diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; neurilemmoma; ganglia; sympathetic; vagus nerve; neck; feasibility studies; CERVICAL SYMPATHETIC CHAIN; MR NEUROGRAPHY; SPACE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) for determining the originating nerve of parapharyngeal schwannomas preoperatively. Methods: Six patients who underwent DW-MRN preoperatively for a parapharyngeal schwannoma were studied. Prediction of the originating nerve was performed. With the conventional method, a tumor showing "separation" between the internal jugular vein and carotid artery was determined to originate from the vagus nerve, with "no separation" from the sympathetic chain. With DW-MRN, the relationships between the vagus nerve and sympathetic chain to the tumor were characterized as "connected" or "dislocated." A nerve connected to the tumor was determined as the origin. Results: Surgeries revealed that the origins included 1 vagus nerve and 5 sympathetic chains. Using a conventional method, all 6 cases were diagnosed correctly, whereas DW-MRN successfully predicted only 4 cases with a sympathetic chain origin. Conclusions: The DW-MRN is a feasible approach for determining an originating nerve.
引用
收藏
页码:930 / 935
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Imaging Characteristics of Schwannoma of the Cervical Sympathetic Chain: A Review of 12 Cases
    Anil, G.
    Tan, T. Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 1408 - 1412
  • [2] MR Neurography: Past, Present, and Future
    Chhabra, Avneesh
    Andreisek, Gustav
    Soldatos, Theodoros
    Wang, Kenneth C.
    Flammang, Aaron J.
    Belzberg, Allan J.
    Carrino, John A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (03) : 583 - 591
  • [3] Parapharyngeal space tumors: 61 case reviews
    Dimitrijevic, M. V.
    Jesic, S. D.
    Mikic, A. A.
    Arsovic, N. A.
    Tomanovic, N. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (10) : 983 - 989
  • [4] MAGNETIC RESONANCE NEUROGRAPHY AND DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING: ORIGINS, HISTORY, AND CLINICAL IMPACT OF THE FIRST 50 000 CASES WITH AN ASSESSMENT OF EFFICACY AND UTILITY IN A PROSPECTIVE 5000-PATIENT STUDY GROUP
    Filler, Aaron
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 65 (04) : A29 - A43
  • [5] Differentiation between schwannoma of the vagus nerve and schwannoma of the cervical sympathetic chain by imaging diagnosis
    Furukawa, M
    Furukawa, MK
    Katoh, K
    Tsukuda, M
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 1996, 106 (12) : 1548 - 1552
  • [6] Imaging Evaluation of the Parapharyngeal Space
    Gupta, Ajay
    Chazen, J. Levi
    Phillips, C. Douglas
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 45 (06) : 1223 - +
  • [7] Harnsberger HR., 2004, Diagnostic imaging: head and neck
  • [8] The glossopharyngeal, vagus and spinal accessory nerves
    Kang, Ong Cheng
    Hin, Chong Vincent Fook
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 74 (02) : 359 - 367
  • [9] Schwannoma of the vagus nerve
    Kehagias, DT
    Bourekas, EC
    Christoforidis, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (03) : 720 - 721
  • [10] Schwannoma in Head and Neck: Preoperative Imaging Study and Intracapsular Enucleation for Functional Nerve Preservation
    Kim, Si Hong
    Kim, Na Hyun
    Kim, Kyung Rok
    Lee, Ja Hyun
    Choi, Hong-Shik
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (06) : 938 - 942