Robust Combined Design and Control Optimization of Hybrid-Electric Vehicles Using MDSDO

被引:14
作者
Azad, Saeed [1 ]
Alexander-Ramos, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northern Kentucky Univ, PGET Dept, Highland Hts, KY 41099 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Mech & Mat Engn Dept, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
关键词
Mechanical power transmission; Hybrid electric vehicles; Uncertainty; Trajectory; Optimization; Dynamical systems; Linear programming; Combined design & control optimization; HEV powertrain design; HEV energy management; robust design; MDSDO; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; COMBUSTION; ENGINE;
D O I
10.1109/TVT.2021.3071863
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Identifying a true, system-level optimal solution for hybrid-electric vehicle (HEV) powertrains requires methods such as combined design and control optimization (co-design) to account for the coupling between powertrain design and optimal energy management strategies. Despite the widespread application of co-design techniques to HEV powertrains in recent years, limited research has been done to account for the inherent uncertainties present in these systems. This is problematic as such uncertainties may not only impact HEV powertrain component sizing and control strategies, but also overall vehicle performance and cost-both of which are critically-important in the fiercely-competitive automotive industry. One way to address this issue is to apply a stochastic dynamic system optimization technique known as robust multidisciplinary dynamic system design optimization (R-MDSDO) to the HEV powertrain co-design problem. This method ensures that the HEV powertrain co-design solution, including its system performance and cost, explicitly accounts for random variations within the system and its problem formulation using concepts from robust design optimization. Therefore, in this study, we formulate and solve a robust co-design problem for a power-split HEV powertrain using R-MDSDO to identify the optimal component designs, state trajectories, and control trajectories such that the vehicle powertrain cost is minimized. The robust solution is then compared to the solution from the associated deterministic problem, with the results indicating that accounting for system uncertainty has a significant impact on HEV powertrain co-design.
引用
收藏
页码:4139 / 4152
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [51] Singh M, 2009, ANLESD095 ANL
  • [52] Soong W. L, 1993, THESIS U GLASGOW GLA
  • [53] Taguchi Genichi., 1988, QUAL RELIAB ENG INT, V4, P198, DOI DOI 10.1002/QRE.4680040216
  • [54] Tod G, 2018, P 16 MECH FOR BIENN, P23
  • [55] U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, 2018, NAT HOUS TRAV SURV W
  • [56] Models of energy sources for EV and HEV: fuel cells, batteries, ultracapacitors, flywheels and engine-generators
    Van Mierlo, J
    Van den Bossche, P
    Maggetto, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2004, 128 (01) : 76 - 89
  • [57] On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming
    Wachter, A
    Biegler, LT
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2006, 106 (01) : 25 - 57
  • [58] Multiobjective Optimization of HEV Fuel Economy and Emissions Using the Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm
    Wu, Lianghong
    Wang, Yaonan
    Yuan, Xiaofang
    Chen, Zhenlong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 60 (06) : 2458 - 2470
  • [59] A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics
    Zang, C
    Friswell, MI
    Mottershead, JE
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2005, 83 (4-5) : 315 - 326