Robust Combined Design and Control Optimization of Hybrid-Electric Vehicles Using MDSDO

被引:14
作者
Azad, Saeed [1 ]
Alexander-Ramos, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northern Kentucky Univ, PGET Dept, Highland Hts, KY 41099 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Mech & Mat Engn Dept, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
关键词
Mechanical power transmission; Hybrid electric vehicles; Uncertainty; Trajectory; Optimization; Dynamical systems; Linear programming; Combined design & control optimization; HEV powertrain design; HEV energy management; robust design; MDSDO; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; COMBUSTION; ENGINE;
D O I
10.1109/TVT.2021.3071863
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Identifying a true, system-level optimal solution for hybrid-electric vehicle (HEV) powertrains requires methods such as combined design and control optimization (co-design) to account for the coupling between powertrain design and optimal energy management strategies. Despite the widespread application of co-design techniques to HEV powertrains in recent years, limited research has been done to account for the inherent uncertainties present in these systems. This is problematic as such uncertainties may not only impact HEV powertrain component sizing and control strategies, but also overall vehicle performance and cost-both of which are critically-important in the fiercely-competitive automotive industry. One way to address this issue is to apply a stochastic dynamic system optimization technique known as robust multidisciplinary dynamic system design optimization (R-MDSDO) to the HEV powertrain co-design problem. This method ensures that the HEV powertrain co-design solution, including its system performance and cost, explicitly accounts for random variations within the system and its problem formulation using concepts from robust design optimization. Therefore, in this study, we formulate and solve a robust co-design problem for a power-split HEV powertrain using R-MDSDO to identify the optimal component designs, state trajectories, and control trajectories such that the vehicle powertrain cost is minimized. The robust solution is then compared to the solution from the associated deterministic problem, with the results indicating that accounting for system uncertainty has a significant impact on HEV powertrain co-design.
引用
收藏
页码:4139 / 4152
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Co-Design of an Active Suspension Using Simultaneous Dynamic Optimization
    Allison, James T.
    Guo, Tinghao
    Han, Zhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2014, 136 (08)
  • [2] Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Dynamic Engineering Systems
    Allison, James T.
    Herber, Daniel R.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2014, 52 (04) : 691 - 710
  • [3] Azad S., 2020, PhD thesis
  • [4] A Single-Loop Reliability-Based MDSDO Formulation for Combined Design and Control Optimization of Stochastic Dynamic Systems
    Azad, Saeed
    Alexander-Ramos, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2021, 143 (02)
  • [5] Robust MDSDO for Co-Design of Stochastic Dynamic Systems
    Azad, Saeed
    Alexander-Ramos, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2020, 142 (01)
  • [6] PHEV powertrain co-design with vehicle performance considerations using MDSDO
    Azad, Saeed
    Behtash, Mohammad
    Houshmand, Arian
    Alexander-Ramos, Michael J.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2019, 60 (03) : 1155 - 1169
  • [7] Azad S, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2A
  • [8] Azad Saeed., 2017, WORLD C STRUCTURAL M, P83
  • [9] Bayrak A. E., 2013, P ASME 2013 INT DES
  • [10] Decomposition-Based Design Optimization of Hybrid Electric Powertrain Architectures: Simultaneous Configuration and Sizing Design
    Bayrak, Alparslan Emrah
    Kang, Namwoo
    Papalambros, Panos Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2016, 138 (07)