Mean-field concept and direct numerical simulations of rotating magnetoconvection and the geodynamo

被引:159
作者
Schrinner, Martin
Radler, Karl-Heinz
Schmitt, Dieter [1 ]
Rheinhardt, Matthias
Christensen, Ulrich R.
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Sonnensystemforsch, D-37191 Katlenburg Duhm, Germany
[2] Astrophysikalisches Inst Potsdam, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
magnetohydrodynamics; mean-field theory; dynamo coefficients; magnetoconvection; geodynamo;
D O I
10.1080/03091920701345707
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Mean-field theory describes magnetohydrodynamic processes leading to large-scale magnetic fields in various cosmic objects. In this study magnetoconvection and dynamo processes in a rotating spherical shell are considered. Mean fields are defined by azimuthal averaging. In the framework of mean-field theory, the coefficients which determine the traditional representation of the mean electromotive force, including derivatives of the mean magnetic field up to the first order, are crucial for analyzing and simulating dynamo action. Two methods are developed to extract mean-field coefficients from direct numerical simulations of the mentioned processes. While the first method does not use intrinsic approximations, the second one is based oil the second-order correlation approximation. There is satisfying agreement of the results of both methods for sufficiently slow fluid motions. Both methods are applied to simulations of rotating magnetoconvection and a quasi-stationary geodynamo. The mean-field induction effects described by these coefficients, e.g., the alpha-effect, are highly anisotropic in both examples. An alpha(2)-mechanism is suggested along with a strong gamma-effect operating Outside the inner core tangent cylinder. The turbulent diffusivity exceeds the molecular one by at least one order or magnitude in the geodynarno example. With the aim to compare mean-field simulations with corresponding direct numerical simulations, a two-dimensional mean-field model involving all previously determined mean-field coefficients was constructed. Various tests with different sets of mean-field coefficients reveal their action and significance. In the magnetoconvection and geodynarno examples considered here, the match between direct numerical simulations and mean-field simulations is only satisfying if a large number of mean-field coefficients are involved. In the magnetoconvection example, the azimuthally averaged magnetic field resulting from the numerical simulation is in good agreement with its counterpart in the mean-field model. However, this match is not completely satisfactory in the geodynarno case anymore. Here the traditional representation of the mean electromotive force ignoring higher than first-order spatial derivatives of the mean magnetic field is no longer a good approximation.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 116
页数:36
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Galactic magnetism: Recent developments and perspectives [J].
Beck, R ;
Brandenburg, A ;
Moss, D ;
Shukurov, A ;
Sokoloff, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 1996, 34 :155-206
[2]   Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Subramanian, K .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 417 (1-4) :1-209
[3]   Minimal tau approximation and simulations of the alpha effect [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Subramanian, K .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2005, 439 (03) :835-U2
[4]   Local and nonlocal magnetic diffusion and alpha-effect tensors in shear flow turbulence [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Sokoloff, D .
GEOPHYSICAL AND ASTROPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2002, 96 (04) :319-344
[5]   Global-scale turbulent convection and magnetic dynamo action in the solar envelope [J].
Brun, AS ;
Miesch, MS ;
Toomre, J .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 614 (02) :1073-1098
[6]  
CARVALHO JC, 1994, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V283, P1046
[7]  
CARVALHO JC, 1992, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V261, P348
[8]   Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study [J].
Christensen, U ;
Olson, P ;
Glatzmaier, GA .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 138 (02) :393-409
[9]   A dynamo model interpretation of geomagnetic field structures [J].
Christensen, U ;
Olson, P ;
Glatzmaier, GA .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (10) :1565-1568
[10]   A numerical dynamo benchmark [J].
Christensen, UR ;
Aubert, J ;
Cardin, P ;
Dormy, E ;
Gibbons, S ;
Glatzmaier, GA ;
Grote, E ;
Honkura, Y ;
Jones, C ;
Kono, M ;
Matsushima, M ;
Sakuraba, A ;
Takahashi, F ;
Tilgner, A ;
Wicht, J ;
Zhang, K .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2001, 128 (1-4) :25-34