Growth and Physiological Responses of Four Rose Rootstocks to Drought Stress

被引:25
作者
Niu, Genhua [1 ]
Rodriguez, Denise S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas AgriLife Res Ctr El Paso, Dept Hort Sci, El Paso, TX 79927 USA
关键词
gas exchange; Rosa; water relation; WATER-STRESS; AVAILABILITY;
D O I
10.21273/JASHS.134.2.202
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Drought-tolerant garden roses (Rosa spp.) are needed in arid and semiarid regions where irrigation water is scarce. The vast majority of garden rose cultivars are budded or grafted onto rootstocks and are seldom grown on their own roots. The objective of this study was to compare the growth and physiological responses of four rose rootstocks to drought stress. Rosa xhybrida 'Dr. Huey', R. xfortuniana, R. multiflora, and R. odorata grown in 12-L containers were well-irrigated throughout the experiment or were subjected to mild drought stress for five or six cycles, depending on rootstocks, over 10 weeks. Following the mild drought stress cycles, plants that received the mild drought treatment were subjected to a severe dry-down before termination of the experiment. In R. xfortuniana, drought stress did not affect any growth parameter. Compared with the well-irrigated plants, shoot dry weight of 'Dr. Huey', R. multiflora, and R. odorata were reduced by 22%, 33%, and 38%, respectively, by the drought treatment. The final leaf area of R. multiflora and R. odorata was reduced by 42% and 59%, respectively, compared with the control plants. The final leaf area of 'Dr. Huey' was not influenced by the drought treatment. Root to shoot ratio in 'Dr. Huey' was unaffected, while that of R. multiflora and R. odorata increased as a result of the drought treatment. As substrate moisture content decreased, leaf relative water content (RWC) of all rootstocks decreased linearly, with differences in decreasing slope or intercept of the linear regression lines among rootstocks. Predawn leaf water potential during the dry-down began to decrease rapidly when substrate moisture content decreased to below 20% (25% in R. odorata) in 'Dr. Huey', R. xfortuniana, and R. multiflora. Leaf net photosynthetic rate (P-n), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (g(s)) of all rootstocks decreased rapidly during the dry-down as substrate moisture content decreased from 25%. In 'Dr. Huey' and R. xfortuniana a, P, E, and gs were closely correlated with leaf RWC, while E and g(s) of R. odorata were not. Correlations between gas exchange rates (P-n, E, and g(s)) and leaf RWC in R. multiflora were weaker than those in 'Dr. Huey' and R. xfortuniana. At low substrate moisture content (below 15%), P-n, E, and g(s) in R. odorata were lower than those in other rootstocks. Growth reduction was greatest in R. odorata, regardless of the least water deficit of the substrate, followed by R. multiflora and 'Dr. Huey'. The results of this study suggest that R. xfortuniana was the most tolerant and R. odorata was the least tolerant to drought stress.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 209
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bjorkman O., 1980, CARNEGIE I WASH YB, V79, P150
[2]   Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation [J].
Blum, A .
PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 1996, 20 (02) :135-148
[3]   Rose yield, dry matter partitioning and nutrient status responses to rootstock selection [J].
Cabrera, RI .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2002, 95 (1-2) :75-83
[4]  
CASTLE WS, 1993, COOP EXT SERV PUBL, V42
[5]   Malformation of roses due to drought stress [J].
Chimonidou-Pavlidou, D .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2004, 99 (01) :79-87
[6]  
Chimonidou-Pavlidou D., 1996, Acta Horticulturae, P45
[7]   MOISTURE STRESS CONDITIONING EFFECTS ON SALVIA-SPLENDENS BONFIRE [J].
EAKES, DJ ;
WRIGHT, RD ;
SEILER, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1991, 116 (04) :716-719
[8]   Seasonal changes in CO2 assimilation in leaves of five major Greek olive cultivars [J].
Hagidimitriou, M ;
Pontikis, CA .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2005, 104 (01) :11-24
[9]   LANDSCAPE ROSE RESPONSE TO LOW MOISTURE LEVELS AND A HYDROPHILIC GEL [J].
HENDERSON, JC ;
DAVIES, FT ;
PEMBERTON, HB .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1991, 46 (1-2) :129-135
[10]  
Henderson-Cole Janet C., 1993, Journal of Environmental Horticulture, V11, P59