Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover

被引:16
作者
Cabral, Pedro [1 ]
Campos, Felipe S. [1 ]
David, Joao [1 ]
Caser, Ursula [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, NOVA Informat Management Sch NOVA IMS, Campus Campolide, P-1070312 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Mediatedomain Lda, P-2775253 Parede, Portugal
关键词
Stakeholder participat i o n; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Land cover change; CORIN E land cover; Natural capital; Portugal; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; TRADE-OFFS; INDICATORS; VALUATION; VALUES; KNOWLEDGE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Understanding where ecosystem services (ES) are and quantifying their supply using stakeholders? information is key for effective sustainable management. This paper describes a participatory methodology for extracting stakeholders? ES perception for continental Portugal based on land cover using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), matrix-based approach with data visualization techniques, and scenario analysis. Results show that drought regulation was the most valued ES by stakeholders and recreation was considered the least important. Results also show that the ?Agricultural areas and ?Forests and semi-natural areas? land cover classes provide about two-thirds of the total ES for the country. An ?Economic development? scenario will yield negative values for all ES except recreation and food supply, whereas an ?Environmental development? scenario will increase all ES, except food supply. Finally, a ?Sustainable development? scenario, presents values between the previous two scenarios and is the best for food supply. This operational methodology for extracting information from stakeholders and to report information on the mapping and assessment of ES can be helpful for sustainable planning in Portugal and elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Environmental and Human Controls of Ecosystem Functional Diversity in Temperate South America [J].
Alcaraz-Segura, Domingo ;
Paruelo, Jose M. ;
Epstein, Howard E. ;
Cabello, Javier .
REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (01) :127-154
[2]   Ranking of ecosystem services on the basis of willingness to pay: Monetary assessment of a subset of ecosystem services in the Heihe River basin [J].
Ali, Muhammad Abu Sufyan ;
Khan, Sufyan Ullah ;
Khan, Aftab ;
Khan, Arshad Ahmad ;
Zhao, Minjuan .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 734
[3]   Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies [J].
Ament, Judith M. ;
Moore, Christine A. ;
Herbst, Marna ;
Cumming, Graeme S. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04) :440-450
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment
[5]  
Burkhard B., 2009, Landscape Online
[6]   Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: A first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France [J].
Cabral, Pedro ;
Feger, Clement ;
Levrel, Harold ;
Chambolle, Melodie ;
Basque, Damien .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 :318-327
[7]  
Campagne C.Sylvie., 2020, One Ecosystem, V5, DOI DOI 10.3897/ONEECO.5.E51103
[8]   Expert-based ecosystem services capacity matrices: Dealing with scoring variability [J].
Campagne, Carole Sylvie ;
Roche, Philip ;
Gosselin, Frederic ;
Tschanz, Leita ;
Tatoni, Thierry .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 79 :63-72
[9]   Scenarios of Land Use and Land Cover Change and Their Multiple Impacts on Natural Capital in Tanzania [J].
Capitani, Claudia ;
van Soesbergen, Arnout ;
Mukama, Kusaga ;
Malugu, Isaac ;
Mbilinyi, Boniface ;
Chamuya, Nurdin ;
Kempen, Bas ;
Malimbwi, Rogers ;
Mant, Rebecca ;
Munishi, Panteleo ;
Njana, Marco Andrew ;
Ortmann, Antonia ;
Platts, Philip J. ;
Runsten, Lisen ;
Sassen, Marieke ;
Sayo, Philippina ;
Shirima, Deo ;
Zahabu, Elikamu ;
Burgess, Neil D. ;
Marchant, Rob .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 46 (01) :17-24
[10]  
Copernicus, 2018, CORINE LAND COV