Importance of interactions between food quality, quantity, and gut transit time on consumer feeding, growth, and trophic dynamics

被引:75
作者
Mitra, Aditee [1 ]
Flynn, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Swansea, Inst Environm Sustainabil, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
关键词
assimilation efficiency; consumer growth dynamics; gut passage time; predation kinetics; food quality;
D O I
10.1086/513187
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ingestion kinetics of animals are controlled by both external food availability and feedback from the quantity of material already within the gut. The latter varies with gut transit time ( GTT) and digestion of the food. Ingestion, assimilation efficiency, and thus, growth dynamics are not related in a simple fashion. For the first time, the important linkage between these processes and GTT is demonstrated; this is achieved using a biomass-based, mechanistic multinutrient model fitted to experimental data for zooplankton growth dynamics when presented with food items of varying quality (stoichiometric composition) or quantity. The results show that trophic transfer dynamics will vary greatly between the extremes of feeding on low-quantity/high-quality versus high-quantity/low-quality food; these conditions are likely to occur in nature. Descriptions of consumer behavior that assume a constant relationship between the kinetics of grazing and growth irrespective of food quality and/or quantity, with little or no recognition of the combined importance of these factors on consumer behavior, may seriously misrepresent consumer activity in dynamic situations.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 646
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   THE TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN DIGESTION RATE AND EFFICIENCY IN WARBLERS AND THEIR ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
AFIK, D ;
KARASOV, WH .
ECOLOGY, 1995, 76 (07) :2247-2257
[2]   Metabolic stoichiometry and the fate of excess carbon and nutrients in consumers [J].
Anderson, TR ;
Hessen, DO ;
Elser, JJ ;
Urabe, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2005, 165 (01) :1-15
[3]   CARBON OR NITROGEN LIMITATION IN MARINE COPEPODS [J].
ANDERSON, TR ;
HESSEN, DO .
JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 1995, 17 (02) :317-331
[4]  
Boersma M, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2552, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2552:LATEIF]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, and carbon cycling in marine systems [J].
Calbet, A ;
Landry, MR .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2004, 49 (01) :51-57
[7]   Chemical ecology of eukaryotic microalgae in marine ecosystems [J].
Cembella, AD .
PHYCOLOGIA, 2003, 42 (04) :420-447
[8]   THE EGG-PRODUCTION OF A MARINE PLANKTONIC COPEPOD IN RELATION TO ITS FOOD-SUPPLY - LABORATORY STUDIES [J].
CHECKLEY, DM .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1980, 25 (03) :430-446
[9]  
DAGG M, 1977, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V22, P99, DOI 10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0099
[10]   A SIMPLE MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE LIMITATIONS TO INFERRING FEEDING-BEHAVIOR OF ZOOPLANKTON FROM GUT CONTENT [J].
DAM, HG ;
PETERSON, WT ;
OKUBO, A .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1991, 69 (1-2) :41-45