The influence of new guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions. Five cycles of audit of a clerk proforma which included a resuscitation decision

被引:10
作者
Diggory, P [1 ]
Cauchi, L
Griffith, D
Jones, V
Lawrence, E
Mehta, A
O'Mahony, P
Vigus, J
机构
[1] Univ London, Mayday Hosp, Dept Med Elderly, London, England
[2] Univ London, Mayday Hosp, Dept Clin Audit, London, England
关键词
cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNAR; proforma;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00349-0
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Current guidelines advise discussion with patients before issuing a 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) order. We report five audit cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) documentation after introducing a proforma, the last cycle following the latest guidelines. In first audit data were collected from 75 patient discharges. CPR decisions were documented in 27 (36%). Four subsequent point prevalence audits carried out on all inpatients following proforma introduction showed documentation improved to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 131/140 (94%) and 102/119 (86%) in cycles two, three, four and five, respectively. The last three audits also revealed that consultants consistently made more DNAR orders than trainee doctors. However, following the introduction of the latest guidelines the proportion of patients in whom a decision was made, and the percentage of those decisions that were DNAR, fell. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 165
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know? [J].
Beresford, N ;
Seymour, L ;
Vincent, C ;
Moat, N .
HEART, 2001, 86 (06) :626-631
[2]   Predicting unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): a comparison of three morbidity scores [J].
Bowker, L ;
Stewart, K .
RESUSCITATION, 1999, 40 (02) :89-95
[3]   Preliminary evidence of impaired thinking in sick patients [J].
Cassell, EJ ;
Leon, AC ;
Kaufman, SG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (12) :1120-1123
[4]  
DANUTZENBERG PLJ, 1993, AGE AGEING, V22, P464
[5]  
EBELL MH, 1992, J FAM PRACTICE, V34, P551
[6]   Risk communication and older people-understanding of probability and risk information by medical inpatients aged 75 years and older [J].
Fuller, R ;
Dudley, N ;
Blacktop, J .
AGE AND AGEING, 2001, 30 (06) :473-476
[7]  
GEORGE AL, 1989, AM J MED, V87, P28
[8]   RESUSCITATION AND PATIENTS VIEWS - QUESTIONING MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD BY PATIENTS [J].
HELLER, A ;
POTTER, J ;
STURGESS, I ;
OWEN, A ;
MCCORMACK, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6951) :408-408
[9]  
HODKINSON H M, 1972, Age and Ageing, V1, P233, DOI 10.1093/ageing/1.4.233
[10]  
MAHONEY F I, 1965, Md State Med J, V14, P61