Projection Framework for Interfacial Treatment for Computational Fluid Dynamics/Computational Structural Dynamics Simulations

被引:2
|
作者
Joseph, Nishit [1 ]
Carrese, Robert [1 ]
Marzocca, Pier [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
PARTITIONED PROCEDURES; MONOLITHIC APPROACH; TRANSIENT SOLUTION; INTERPOLATION; LOAD; ALGORITHMS; MODELS;
D O I
10.2514/1.J058886
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents a physics-based projection framework for the interfacial treatment of spatially and topologically different grids. The formulation proposes the use of constraint type elements, commonly used in finite element analysis, to establish the projection matrix. Through a series of verification studies, the proposed method is demonstrated to apply to any underlying finite element type and yields increased accuracy in projecting field values when compared with conventional mathematical-based interpolation approaches, such as radial basis functions (RBFs). The sensitivity of the approach to the number of connection points and the resolution of a computational structural dynamics grid are investigated, and optimal parameters are presented. The framework is demonstrated to be feasible for complex aeroelastic system configurations by using a representative F/A-18 Super Hornet dynamic beam-rod model. The proposed framework suggests a more physically viable transformation of the mode shapes as compared with RBFs without any additional preprocessing that would otherwise be necessary. Investigations of the forced harmonic response of the F/A-18 Super Hornet aeroelastic system showed significant differences in the dynamic response. Flutter results for the scaled model using the proposed approach accurately estimated the altitude. At the same time, RBFs showed a large discrepancy, highlighting the importance of the interfacial treatment for investigations of aeroelastic responses, as well as the assessment of critical dynamic loads.
引用
收藏
页码:2070 / 2083
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surge Resistance Identification of Inland Vessels by Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Peeters, Gerben
    Eggers, Arne
    Boonen, Rene
    Slaets, Peter
    Vanierschot, Maarten
    2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE KOBE TECHNO-OCEANS (OTO), 2018,
  • [22] A new computational fluid dynamics code I: Fyris Alpha
    Sutherland, Ralph S.
    ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (02) : 173 - 206
  • [23] A new computational fluid dynamics code I: Fyris Alpha
    Ralph S. Sutherland
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 2010, 327 : 173 - 206
  • [24] Coupled multibody dynamics and computational fluid dynamics approach for amphibious vehicles in the surf zone
    Yamashita, H.
    Arnold, A.
    Carrica, P. M.
    Noack, R. W.
    Martin, J. E.
    Sugiyama, H.
    Harwood, C.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 257
  • [25] Local Wavelet Adaptation of Cartesian Grids in Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Afendikov, A. L.
    Nikitin, V. S.
    COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 64 (02) : 300 - 313
  • [26] COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF AIRFLOW THROUGH STANDING VEGETATION
    Gonzales, H. B.
    Tatarko, J.
    Casada, M. E.
    Maghirang, R. G.
    Hagen, L. J.
    Barden, C. J.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2019, 62 (06) : 1713 - 1722
  • [27] Computational fluid dynamics: a primer for congenital heart disease clinicians
    Gerrah, Rabin
    Haller, Stephen J.
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2020, 28 (08) : 520 - 532
  • [28] Optimizing HVAC Design for Pharmaceutical Requirements with Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Liu, Lijun
    Huang, Yilei
    COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2023-RESILIENCE, SAFETY, AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, : 1005 - 1013
  • [29] Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Multiphase Flow in Structured Packings
    Shojaee, Saeed
    Hosseini, Seyyed Hossein
    Razavi, Behzad Saeedi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2012,
  • [30] A decade of progress on anisotropic mesh adaptation for computational fluid dynamics
    Alauzet, Frederic
    Loseille, Adrien
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2016, 72 : 13 - 39