Dosimetric advantages of proton therapy compared with photon therapy using an adaptive strategy in cervical cancer

被引:25
作者
van de Schoot, Agustinus J. A. J. [1 ]
de Boer, Peter [1 ]
Crama, Koen F. [1 ]
Visser, Jorrit [1 ]
Stalpers, Lukas J. A. [1 ]
Rasch, Coen R. N. [1 ]
Bel, Arjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; DEFORMABLE IMAGE REGISTRATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; PARAAORTIC IRRADIATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; BLADDER-CANCER; BEAM THERAPY; IMRT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3109/0284186X.2016.1139179
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Image-guided adaptive proton therapy (IGAPT) can potentially be applied to take into account interfraction motion while limiting organ at risk (OAR) dose in cervical cancer radiation therapy (RT). In this study, the potential dosimetric advantages of IGAPT compared with photon-based image-guided adaptive RT (IGART) were investigated.Material and methods For 13 cervical cancer patients, full and empty bladder planning computed tomography (CT) images and weekly CTs were acquired. Based on both primary clinical target volumes (pCTVs) [i.e. gross tumor volume (GTV), cervix, corpus-uterus and upper part of the vagina] on planning CTs, the pretreatment observed full range primary internal target volume (pITV) was interpolated to derive pITV subranges. Given corresponding ITVs (i.e. pITVs including lymph nodes), patient-specific photon and proton plan libraries were generated. Using all weekly CTs, IGART and IGAPT treatments were simulated by selecting library plans and recalculating the dose. For each recalculated IGART and IGAPT fraction, CTV (i.e. pCTV including lymph nodes) coverage was assessed and differences in fractionated substitutes of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters (V-15Gy, V-30Gy, V-45Gy, D-mean, D-2cc) for bladder, bowel and rectum were tested for significance (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Also, differences in toxicity-related DVH parameters (rectum V-30Gy, bowel V-45Gy) were approximated based on accumulated dose distributions.Results In 92% (96%) of all recalculated IGAPT (IGART) fractions adequate CTV coverage (V-95%>98%) was obtained. All dose parameters for bladder, bowel and rectum, except the fractionated substitute for rectum V-45Gy, were improved using IGAPT. Also, IGAPT reduced the mean dose to bowel, bladder and rectum significantly (p<0.01). In addition, an average decrease of rectum V-30Gy and bowel V-45Gy indicated reductions in toxicity probabilities when using IGAPT.Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility of IGAPT in cervical cancer using a plan-library based plan-of-the-day approach. Compared to photon-based IGART, IGAPT maintains target coverage while significant dose reductions for the bladder, bowel and rectum can be achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 899
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] A symmetric nonrigid registration method to handle large organ deformations in cervical cancer patients
    Bondar, Luiza
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    Osorio, Eliana M. Vasquez
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (07) : 3760 - 3772
  • [2] Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01
    Eifel, PJ
    Winter, K
    Morris, M
    Levenback, C
    Grigsby, PW
    Cooper, J
    Rotman, M
    Gershenson, D
    Mutch, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) : 872 - 880
  • [3] Physics Controversies in Proton Therapy
    Engelsman, Martijn
    Schwarz, Marco
    Dong, Lei
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 23 (02) : 88 - 96
  • [4] Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy
    Fredriksson, Albin
    Forsgren, Anders
    Hardemark, Bjorn
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1672 - 1684
  • [5] Pelvic Normal Tissue Contouring Guidelines for Radiation Therapy: A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Consensus Panel Atlas
    Gay, Hiram A.
    Barthold, H. Joseph
    O'Meara, Elizabeth
    Bosch, Walter R.
    El Naqa, Issam
    Al-Lozi, Rawan
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    Lawton, Colleen
    Lee, W. Robert
    Sandler, Howard
    Zietman, Anthony
    Myerson, Robert
    Dawson, Laura A.
    Willett, Christopher
    Kachnic, Lisa A.
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Portelance, Lorraine
    Ryu, Janice
    Small, William, Jr.
    Gaffney, David
    Viswanathan, Akila N.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03): : E353 - E362
  • [6] Image-guided radiotherapy for cervix cancer:: High-tech external beam therapy versus high-tech brachytherapy
    Georg, Dietmar
    Kirisits, Christian
    Hillbrand, Martin
    Dimopoulos, Johannes
    Poetter, Richard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (04): : 1272 - 1278
  • [7] Quantification of intra-fraction changes during radiotherapy of cervical cancer assessed with pre- and post-fraction Cone Beam CT scans
    Heijkoop, Sabrina T.
    Langerak, Thomas R.
    Quint, Sandra
    Mens, Jan Willem M.
    Zolnay, Andras G.
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 117 (03) : 536 - 541
  • [8] Clinical Implementation of an Online Adaptive Plan-of-the-Day Protocol for Nonrigid Motion Management in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer IMRT
    Heijkoop, Sabrina T.
    Langerak, Thomas R.
    Quint, Sandra
    Bondar, Luiza
    Mens, Jan Willem M.
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (03): : 673 - 679
  • [9] A Systematic Review of Organ Motion and Image-guided Strategies in External Beam Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
    Jadon, R.
    Pembroke, C. A.
    Hanna, C. L.
    Palaniappan, N.
    Evans, M.
    Cleves, A. E.
    Staffurth, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (04) : 185 - 196
  • [10] The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer, other urological cancers and gynaecological cancers
    Johansson, B
    Ridderheim, M
    Glimelius, B
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (08) : 890 - 895