Results of a Five-Year Experience in First Trimester Preeclampsia Screening

被引:2
作者
Capriglione, Stella [1 ]
Gulino, Ferdinando Antonio [2 ]
Latella, Silvia [3 ]
De Felice, Giovanna [3 ]
Filippini, Maurizio [3 ]
Farinelli, Miriam [3 ]
Martire, Francesco Giuseppe [4 ]
Viora, Elsa [5 ]
机构
[1] Osped Santa Maria Alla Gruccia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Piazza Volontariato 2, I-52025 Montevarchi, Italy
[2] Azienda Rilievo Nazl & Alta Specializzaz ARNAS Ga, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Via Palermo 636, I-95126 Catania, Italy
[3] Ist Sicurezza Sociale, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cailungo 47893, Borgo Maggiore, San Marino
[4] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Surg Sci, Gynecol Unit, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[5] St Anna Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Obstet Gynecol Ultrasound Unit, I-10126 Turin, Italy
关键词
preeclampsia; first trimester; screening; fetal DNA; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; RISK; MANAGEMENT; PATERNITY; WOMEN; TWIN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11154555
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the ability defining the risk of developing preeclampsia by a screening test carried out in the first trimester (between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestational age), in order to identify high-risk women requiring more intensive health surveillance. The secondary objective was to evaluate the ability of this test to predict the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes such as fetal growth restriction, intrauterine fetal death, gestational hypertension, HELLP syndrome, placental abruption, and preterm birth. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center study, conducted at the Operative Unit of Obstetrics of the State Hospital of the Republic of San Marino. Medical history was collected at the time of enrolment in writing. Subsequently, obstetric outcomes were collected for each enrolled woman, through the analysis of medical records. Results: From October 2014 to May 2019, 589 pregnant women were recruited, of whom, 474 (80.5%) were included in the "low-risk" group, and 115 (19.5%) in the "high-risk" group. At the time of analysis of this population, the obstetric outcomes were available for 498 women (84.5%), while 91 cases (15.5%) were current pregnancies. The PI of the uterine arteries was not significantly different between the two study groups. Otherwise, a significant difference was highlighted for MAP, which is higher in the case of pregnancies at high risk based on the risk factors only, and for PAPP-A, higher in the case of low-risk pregnancies. Regarding the percentage of fetal DNA, according to the most recent literature data, in our series, we report a statistically significant difference of the average between the low and high-risk groups. Conclusions: In our study, we demonstrate that the multiparametric screening test for early PE performed well in identifying women at high risk of early PE, which certainly has the most severe maternal-fetal outcomes. The data reported that ASA intake at low doses is significantly higher in the population with high-risk tests for both early PE and late PE suggest once again that anamnestic evaluation plays an essential role in women's screening.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist, Montelukast Ameliorates L-NAME-Induced Pre-eclampsia in Rats through Suppressing the IL-6/Jak2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway
    Abdelzaher, Walaa Yehia
    Mostafa-Hedeab, Gomaa
    Bahaa, Haitham Ahmed
    Mahran, Ahmad
    Fawzy, Michael Atef
    Hafez, Sara Mohamed Naguib Abdel
    Welson, Nermeen N.
    Rofaeil, Remon Roshdy
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICALS, 2022, 15 (08)
  • [2] Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers
    Akolekar, Ranjit
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Poon, Leona
    Wright, David
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2013, 33 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [3] Practical guide for the management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy
    Antza, Christina
    Stabouli, Stella
    Kotsis, Vasilios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (07) : 1257 - 1264
  • [4] Higher risk of pre-eclampsia after change of partner. An effect of longer interpregnancy intervals?
    Basso, O
    Christensen, K
    Olsen, J
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (06) : 624 - 629
  • [5] Does Low PAPP-A Predict Adverse Placenta-Mediated Outcomes in a Low-Risk Nulliparous Population? the Great Obstetrical Syndromes (GOS) Study
    Boutin, Amelie
    Gasse, Cedric
    Demers, Suzanne
    Blanchet, Genevieve
    Giguere, Yves
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2018, 40 (06) : 663 - 668
  • [6] Preeclampsia and the challenge of early prediction: reality or utopia? State of art and critical review of literature
    Capriglione, Stella
    Plotti, Francesco
    Terranova, Corrado
    Gulino, Ferdinando Antonio
    Di Guardo, Federica
    Lopez, Salvatore
    Scaletta, Giuseppe
    Angioli, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (04) : 677 - 686
  • [7] Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cnossen, Jeltsje S.
    Vollebregt, Karlijn C.
    de Vrieze, Nynke
    ter Riet, Gerben
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Franx, Arie
    Khan, Khalid S.
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7653): : 1117 - 1120
  • [8] Cell-Free Fetal DNA for the Prediction of Pre-Eclampsia at the First and Second Trimesters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Contro, Elena
    Bernabini, Dalila
    Farina, Antonio
    [J]. MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2017, 21 (02) : 125 - 135
  • [9] The Influence of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancies Associated with Preeclampsia: A Case-Control Study
    Dahma, George
    Neamtu, Radu
    Nitu, Razvan
    Gluhovschi, Adrian
    Bratosin, Felix
    Grigoras, Mirela Loredana
    Silaghi, Carmen
    Citu, Cosmin
    Orlu, Igwe Nwobueze
    Bhattarai, Sanket
    Mocanu, Adelina Geanina
    Craina, Marius
    Bernad, Elena
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [10] Risk factors for preeclampsia in multiparous women: Primipaternity versus the birth interval hypothesis
    Deen, ME
    Ruurda, LGC
    Wang, J
    Dekker, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (02) : 79 - 84