Hydrogen storage for wind parks: A real options evaluation for an optimal investment in more flexibility

被引:96
作者
Kroniger, Daniel [1 ]
Madlener, Reinhard [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Mech Engn, Inst Power Plant Technol Steam & Gas Turbines IKD, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, E ON Energy Res Ctr, Sch Business & Econ, Inst Future Energy Consumer Needs & Behav FCN, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Wind power; Hydrogen storage; Real options analysis; Optimal investment decision-making; ENERGY-STORAGE; POWER; TECHNOLOGIES; INTEGRATION; HYDROPOWER; SCHEMES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.041
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate the economic viability of hydrogen storage for excess electricity produced in wind power plants. For the analysis, we define two scenarios (50 MW system with and without re-electrification unit) and apply Monte Carlo simulation and real options analysis (ROA) to compute hourly profits under uncertainty regarding wind speed, spot market electricity prices, and call of minute reserve capacity. Hydrogen as a storage medium helps to either (1) increase capacity utilization of the wind park in case of grid disconnection; (2) to offer minute reserve; or (3) to exploit temporal price arbitrage at the electricity spot market; additionally, hydrogen can also be directly sold as a commodity. We find that power-to-power operation is highly uneconomical under current framework conditions in Germany, irrespective of potential energy efficiency gains. Interestingly, due to counterbalancing effects, offshore wind parks are found to have only a modest economic advantage compared to onshore ones. The power-to-fuel plant can be operated profitably (at hydrogen prices of more than 0.36 epsilon m(-3) and a 100% utilization of the electrolyzer) if hydrogen is directly marketed instead of used to store and re-generate electrical energy. The ROA recommends investment in a storage device without re-electrification unit beyond an expected project value that is about twice the investment cost of the storage device, a figure which is reduced markedly as conversion efficiency rises, assuming technical change to come at no cost for the investor, i.e. as being exogenous. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 946
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AGEB, 2013, ARB EN EV
[2]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[3]   Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects [J].
Bockman, Thor ;
Fleten, Stein-Erik ;
Juliussen, Erik ;
Langhammer, Havard J. ;
Revdal, Ingemar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 190 (01) :255-267
[4]   Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach [J].
Boomsma, Trine Krogh ;
Meade, Nigel ;
Fleten, Stein-Erik .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 220 (01) :225-237
[5]   On the role of fuel cells and hydrogen in a more sustainable and renewable energy future [J].
Brouwer, Jacob .
CURRENT APPLIED PHYSICS, 2010, 10 :S9-S17
[6]   A review of energy storage technologies for wind power applications [J].
Diaz-Gonzalez, Francisco ;
Sumper, Andreas ;
Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol ;
Villafafila-Robles, Roberto .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (04) :2154-2171
[7]   INVESTMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - DIXIT,AK, PINDYCK,RS [J].
SCHWARTZ, ES .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1994, 49 (05) :1924-1928
[8]  
Elverhoi M, 2010, 23005 MPRA NORW U SC
[9]  
Gamallo F, 2007, NUTZUNG REGENERAT EN, V14, P34
[10]  
Gatzen C., 2008, THESIS