Efficiency of Ontario primary care physicians across payment models: a stochastic frontier analysis

被引:11
作者
laberge, Maude [1 ,2 ]
Wodchis, Walter P. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Barnsley, Jan [3 ,4 ]
Laporte, Audrey [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Serv Res Management & Policy, 1225 Ctr Dr,Room 3111, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Canadian Ctr Hlth Econ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW | 2016年 / 6卷
关键词
Efficiency; Physician remuneration; Frontier analysis; Primary care; Productivity; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; DECISION-MAKING; VISIT DURATION; TIME SPENT; SERVICE; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13561-016-0101-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The study examines the relationship between the primary care model that a physician belongs to and the efficiency of the primary care physician in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Survey data were collected from 183 self-selected physicians and linked to administrative databases to capture the provision of services to the patients served for the 12 month period ending June 30, 2013, and the characteristics of the patients at the beginning of the study period. Two stochastic frontier regression models were used to estimate efficiency scores and parameters for two separate outputs: the number of distinct patients seen and the number of visits. Results: Because of missing data, only 165 physicians were included in the analyses. The average efficiency was 0.72 for both outputs with scores varying from 4 % to 93 % for the visits and 5 % to 94 % for the number of patients seen. We observed that there were both very low and very high efficiency scores within each model. These variations were larger than variations in average scores across models.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Impact of the physician's participatory style in asthma outcomes and patient satisfaction
    Adams, RJ
    Smith, BJ
    Ruffin, RE
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) : 263 - 271
  • [2] Aigner D., 1977, J. Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
  • [3] Treatment and referral decisions under different physician payment mechanisms
    Allard, Marie
    Jelovac, Izabela
    Leger, Pierre Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 30 (05) : 880 - 893
  • [4] Estimating a Reasonable Patient Panel Size for Primary Care Physicians With Team-Based Task Delegation
    Altschuler, Justin
    Margolius, David
    Bodenheimer, Thomas
    Grumbach, Kevin
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 10 (05) : 396 - 400
  • [5] The Time Needed for Clinical Documentation versus Direct Patient Care - A Work-sampling Analysis of Physicians' Activities
    Ammenwerth, E.
    Spoetl, H.-P.
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2009, 48 (01) : 84 - 91
  • [6] Andes Steven, 2002, Manag Care, V11, P48
  • [7] Measuring the efficiency of prescribing by general practitioners
    Bates, JM
    Baines, D
    Whynes, DK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1996, 47 (12) : 1443 - 1451
  • [8] Battese G.E., 1995, Empirical Econ, V20, P325
  • [9] PRACTITIONER PRODUCTIVITY AND THE PRODUCT CONTENT OF MEDICAL-CARE IN PUBLICLY SUPPORTED HEALTH CENTERS
    CAMASSO, MJ
    CAMASSO, AE
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1994, 38 (05) : 733 - 748
  • [10] Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues
    Chaix-Couturier, C
    Durand-Zaleski, I
    Jolly, D
    Durieux, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 12 (02) : 133 - 142