Analyzing Teachers' Use of Metadiscourse: The Missing Element in Classroom Discourse Analysis

被引:30
作者
Tang, Kok-Sing [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Educ, Sci & Math Educ Ctr, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
SCIENCE CLASSROOMS; ACADEMIC IDENTITY; LITERACY; REPRESENTATIONS; FOUNDATIONS; PATTERNS; TALK;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21275
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Metadiscourse, or metatalk, is a discursive resource used in virtually any text or conversation to organize its content or signal the author's stance toward the content. Despite its prevalence in classroom talk, few have examined the role of metadiscourse and how it assists teachers and students to manage classroom communication of scientific knowledge. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyze how science teachers use metadiscourse to construct scientific knowledge with their students. Based on a corpus of classroom video data, I developed a typology of metadiscourse commonly found in science classroom discourse. The typology comprises six major categories of metadiscourse, namely text connective, knowledge connective, activity connective, attitude marker, epistemology marker, and interpretive marker. In addition, I showed how the analysis on metadiscourse was necessary to complement the gaps from classroom analysis focusing on the interaction and content development aspects of classroom talk, particularly during the opening and reviewing stages of constructing a scientific explanation. With a better understanding of metadiscourse, its potential use as a pedagogical intervention to promote science learning is then discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 583
页数:36
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Dialogic inquiry:Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education
[2]  
Bakhtin Mikhail Mikhalovich., 1986, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
[3]  
Barnes D., 1977, Communication and learning in small groups
[4]  
Cazden C.B., 1988, Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning
[5]   Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking [J].
Chin, Christine .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2007, 44 (06) :815-843
[6]   Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses [J].
Chin, Christine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2006, 28 (11) :1315-1346
[7]   Students' Questions and Discursive Interaction: Their Impact on Argumentation During Collaborative Group Discussions in Science [J].
Chin, Christine ;
Osborne, Jonathan .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2010, 47 (07) :883-908
[8]   METADISCOURSE IN PERSUASIVE WRITING - A STUDY OF TEXTS WRITTEN BY AMERICAN AND FINNISH UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS [J].
CRISMORE, A ;
MARKKANEN, R ;
STEFFENSEN, MS .
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 1993, 10 (01) :39-71
[9]  
Dillon J.T., 1985, TEACH TEACH EDUC, V1, P109
[10]  
Edwards D., 1987, COMMON KNOWLEDGE DEV