Relationship between Teach-back and patient-centered communication in primary care pediatric encounters

被引:37
作者
Badaczewski, Adam [1 ]
Bauman, Laurie J. [2 ]
Blank, Arthur E. [2 ]
Dreyer, Benard [3 ]
Abrams, Mary Ann [4 ]
Stein, Ruth E. K. [2 ]
Roter, Debra L. [5 ]
Hossain, Jobayer [1 ]
Byck, Hal [1 ,6 ]
Sharif, Iman [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Nemours Alfred I duPont Hosp Children, Wilmington, DE USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Montefiore, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY USA
[3] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Teach-back; Patient-centered; Communication; Global affect; INTERACTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.022
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: We proposed and tested a theoretical framework for how use of Teach-back could influence communication during the pediatric clinical encounter. Methods: Audio-taped pediatric primary care encounters with 44 children with asthma were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System to measure patient-centered communication and affective engagement of the parent. A newly created Teach-back Loop Score measured the extent to which Teach-back occurred during the clinical encounter; parental health literacy was measured by Newest Vital Sign. Logistic regression was used to test the relationship between Teach-back and features of communication. Focus groups held separately with clinicians and parents elicited perceptions of Teachback usefulness. Results: Teach-back was used in 39% of encounters. Visits with Teach-back had more patient centered communication (p = 0.01). Adjusting for parent health literacy, parent age, and child age, Teach-back increased the odds of both patient centered communication [proportional AOR (95% CI) = 4.97 (4.47-5.53)] and negative affect [AOR (95% CI) = 5.39 (1.68-17.31)]. Focus group themes common to clinicians and parents included: Teach-back is effective, could cause discomfort, should be used with children, and nurses should use it. Conclusions: Teach-back was associated with more patient-centered communication and increased affective engagement of parents. Practice implications: Standardizing Teach-back use may strengthen patient-centered communication. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1345 / 1352
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abrams M.A., 2016, ALWAYS USE TEACH BAC
[2]  
AMA Foundation, 2007, HLTH LIT PAT SAF HEL
[3]  
[Anonymous], PLAIN LANGUAGE PEDIA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FAT DOCTOR
[5]   Evidence On The Chronic Care Model In The New Millennium [J].
Coleman, Katie ;
Austin, Brian T. ;
Brach, Cindy ;
Wagner, Edward H. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (01) :75-85
[6]  
Coleman T, 1998, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V48, P971
[7]  
DeWalt D., 2010, Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit
[8]  
Halley MC, 2013, J COMP EFFECT RES, V2, P421, DOI [10.2217/cer.13.46, 10.2217/CER.13.46]
[9]   Who Gets a Teach-Back? Patient-Reported Incidence of Experiencing a Teach-Back [J].
Jager, Andrew J. ;
Wynia, Matthew K. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 :294-302
[10]   Patient-Centered Care Model Demands Better Physician-Patient Communication [J].
Kuehn, Bridget M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (05) :441-442