Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy

被引:24
作者
Voska, Michal [1 ]
Zavoral, Miroslav [1 ]
Grega, Tomas [1 ]
Majek, Ondrej [2 ]
Martinek, Jan [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Tacheci, Ilja [6 ]
Benes, Marek [3 ,7 ]
Vojtechova, Gabriela [1 ]
Drastich, Pavel [3 ,7 ]
Bures, Jan [6 ]
Spicak, Julius [3 ]
Buckova, Barbora [2 ]
Ngo, Ondrej [2 ]
Suchanek, Stepan [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Mil Univ Hosp, Fac Med 1, Dept Med, CZ-16902 Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Med, Inst Biostat & Anal, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, CZ-14021 Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Charles Univ Prague, Inst Physiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Univ Ostrava, Med Fac, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[6] Charles Univ Prague, Univ Hosp Hradec Kralove, Dept Internal Med Gastroenterol 2, Fac Med Hradec Kralove, CZ-50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
[7] GEP Clin, CZ-13000 Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
CANCER; INDICATORS; MORTALITY; POLYPS;
D O I
10.1155/2019/5975438
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Backround. Capsule colonoscopy might present an alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia screening. Aim. To assess the accuracy of second-generation capsule colonoscopy (CCE2) for colorectal neoplasia detection compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). Methods. From 2011-2015, we performed a multicenter, prospective, cross-over study evaluating the use of CCE2 as a possible colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test based on the assessment of the method's characteristics (accuracy) and safety and patient acceptance of the routine. Enrolled participants fulfilled the CRC screening population criteria if they were asymptomatic, were older than 50, and had no personal or familial history of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was accuracy for the detection of polyps >= 6 mm. Secondary outcomes were accuracy for all polyps, polyps >= 10 mm, adenomas >= 10 mm, and cancers, the quality of bowel cleansing, safety, and CCE2 acceptability by the screening population. Results. A total of 236 individuals were examined; 11 patients (5%) were excluded. Therefore, 225 subjects (95%) were considered in the intention-to-screen (ITS) group. A total of 201 patients (89%) completed both examinations successfully (per protocol group). In the ITS group, polyps were diagnosed during CC in 114 subjects (51%); polyps >= 6 mm, polyps >= 10 mm, and adenomas >= 10 mm were diagnosed in 34 (15%), 16 (7%), and 11 (5%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity of CCE2 for polyps >= 6 mm, polyps >= 10 mm, and adenomas >= 10 mm was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62-91%), 88% (95% CI: 62-98%), and 100% (95% CI: 72-100%), respectively. Conclusion. Second-generation capsule colonoscopy is a safe, noninvasive, and sensitive method for colorectal neoplasia detection although CC remains the preferred method for considerable proportion of subjects. CCE2 may therefore be accepted as the primary screening test for colorectal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Atkin, Wendy S.
    Edwards, Rob
    Kralj-Hans, Ines
    Wooldrage, Kate
    Hart, Andrew R.
    Northover, John M. A.
    Parkin, D. Max
    Wardle, Jane
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Cuzick, Jack
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) : 1624 - 1633
  • [2] Fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer - Can we afford not to do this?
    Bond, JH
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 26 (01) : 57 - &
  • [3] Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening
    Groth, Stefan
    Krause, Horst
    Behrendt, Rainer
    Hill, Helge
    Boerner, Michael
    Bastuerk, Murat
    Plathner, Nora
    Schuette, Friedrich
    Gauger, Ulrich
    Riemann, Juergen Ferdinand
    Altenhofen, Lutz
    Roesch, Thomas
    [J]. BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [4] Colon capsule endoscopy as possible filter test for colonoscopy selection in a screening population with positive fecal immunology
    Holleran, Grainne
    Leen, Ronan
    O'Morain, Colm
    McNamara, Deirdre
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (06) : 473 - 478
  • [5] Wireless capsule endoscopy
    Iddan, G
    Meron, G
    Glukhovsky, A
    Swain, P
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 405 (6785) : 417 - 417
  • [6] Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: Defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world
    Kamangar, Farin
    Dores, Graca M.
    Anderson, William F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (14) : 2137 - 2150
  • [7] Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    Kraszewska, Ewa
    Polkowski, Marcin
    Wojciechowska, Urszula
    Didkowska, Joanna
    Zwierko, Maria
    Rupinski, Maciej
    Nowacki, Marek P.
    Butruk, Eugeniusz
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (19) : 1795 - 1803
  • [8] Back-to-back colon capsule endoscopy and optical colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening individuals
    Kobaek-Larsen, M.
    Kroijer, R.
    Dyrvig, A. -K.
    Buijs, M. M.
    Steele, R. J. C.
    Qvist, N.
    Baatrup, G.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (06) : 479 - 485
  • [9] REDUCING MORTALITY FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER BY SCREENING FOR FECAL OCCULT BLOOD
    MANDEL, JS
    BOND, JH
    CHURCH, TR
    SNOVER, DC
    BRADLEY, GM
    SCHUMAN, LM
    EDERER, F
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (19) : 1365 - 1371
  • [10] Patient tolerance and acceptance of different colonic imaging modalities: an observational cohort study
    Ojidu, Hannah
    Palmer, Hansa
    Lewandowski, Jakub
    Hampton, James
    Blakeborough, Tony
    Epstein, Owen
    McAlindon, Mark E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 30 (05) : 520 - 525