The author argues for passing on a particular brand of feminism to next generations. The cultural archive (after Said) to be passed on should be trans-national, intersectional, interdisciplinary, relational and reflexive. In particular, the author focuses on processes and practices of racialization as they impact on and are practised within the discipline. In the current backlash against feminism and women's studies in different parts of Europe, frequently divisionary tactics are deployed, by which women are pitted against each other, based on assumed immutable differences which are conceived of as either 'raciological' (after Gilroy), ethnicized or as cultural, in such a way that 'race' enters again through the back door. The author argues that we need a European brand of feminism that is not complicit with the legacies of modernity which continue to construct 'race'. That is, we should be deeply concerned with, thinking through the parameters of a viable anti-racist European women's studies. By analysing various case studies, taken from the everyday Dutch reality at the beginning of this new millennium, the author shows the necessity and inescapability of the feminism she advocates.