Respiratory-triggered Three-dimensional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography after Injection of Gadoxetate Disodium: Is It Still Reliable?

被引:20
作者
Ringe, Kristina I. [1 ]
Gupta, Rajan T. [3 ]
Brady, Christopher M. [3 ]
Massey, Christopher M. [3 ]
Hahn, Andreas [2 ]
Galanski, Michael [1 ]
Merkle, Elmar M. [3 ]
Lotz, Joachim [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Radiol, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Biometry, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
GD-EOB-DTPA; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; CONTRAST AGENT; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; EXPERIENCE; DIAGNOSIS; LESIONS; BOPTA;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10091130
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To test the null hypothesis that there is no quantitative or qualitative difference between respiratory-triggered three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography performed before or after administration of gadoxetate disodium. Materials and Methods: For this retrospective HIPAA-compliant dual-center study, institutional review board approval was obtained, and a waiver of informed consent was granted. Between July and December 2008, 60 patients (age range, 18-82 years) who were referred for liver MR imaging with gadoxetate disodium underwent respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiography before and immediately after completion of portal venous phase contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Quantitative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements were obtained in the extrahepatic biliary tract in both MR cholangiographic data sets in each patient. Qualitative assessment was performed by four readers with a four-point scale to assess the depiction of extra-and intrahepatic ducts up to the third order. Statistical analysis consisted of a one-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test, with a P value of less than .05 indicating a significant difference. Results: There was a significant decrease in mean SNR in the MR cholangiographic data set after injection of gadoxetate disodium. SNR was 96 +/- 50 [standard deviation] and 78 +/- 47 before and after contrast media administration, respectively (P < .0001). For all readers, qualitative differences were most obvious in the depiction of the common bile duct and second-and third-order biliary branches, with the precontrast MR cholangiographic data sets being preferred (P < .0001). Precontrast data sets were also significantly preferred in the assessment of the right and left hepatic ducts by all readers. Conclusion: Gadoxetate disodium adversely affects respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiography, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We recommend that such a sequence be performed before injection of gadoxetate disodium. (C) RSNA, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 458
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] MR imaging features of primary sclerosing cholangitis: Patterns of cirrhosis in relationship to clinical severity of disease
    Bader, TR
    Beavers, KL
    Semelka, RC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (03) : 675 - 685
  • [2] Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-DTPA as a hepatobiliary contrast agent for use in MR cholangiography: Results of an in vivo phase-I clinical evaluation
    Bollow, M
    Taupitz, M
    Hamm, B
    Staks, T
    Wolf, KJ
    Weinmann, HJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (01) : 126 - 132
  • [3] Ischemic-type biliary lesions in liver transplant recipients: Evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiography
    Boraschi, P
    Donati, F
    Gigoni, R
    Urbani, L
    Femia, M
    Cossu, MC
    Filipponi, F
    Falaschi, F
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (09) : 2744 - 2747
  • [4] Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid as an intrabiliary contrast agent: Preliminary assessment
    Carlos, RC
    Hussain, HK
    Song, JH
    Francis, IR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [5] Biliary Imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA: Is a 20-minute delay sufficient?'
    Carlos, RC
    Branam, JD
    Dong, Q
    Hussain, HK
    Francis, IR
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (11) : 1322 - 1325
  • [6] MRCP vs ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies:: Review of current literature
    Hekimoglu, Koray
    Ustundag, Yucel
    Dusak, Abdurrahim
    Erdem, Zuhal
    Karademir, Bulent
    Aydemir, Selim
    Gundogdu, Sadi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2008, 9 (03) : 162 - 169
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography using gadolinium-EOB-DTPA. Preliminary experience and clinical applications
    Holzapfel, K.
    Breitwieser, C.
    Prinz, C.
    Rummeny, E. J.
    Gaa, J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 2007, 47 (06): : 536 - 544
  • [8] Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: Prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
    Holzknecht, N
    Gauger, J
    Sackmann, M
    Thoeni, RF
    Schurig, J
    Holl, J
    Weinzierl, M
    Helmberger, T
    Paumgartner, G
    Reiser, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (03) : 657 - 664
  • [9] Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) - An overview
    Kirchin, MA
    Pirovano, GP
    Spinazzi, A
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (11) : 798 - 809
  • [10] MRI for evaluating congenital bile duct abnormalities
    Krausé, D
    Cercueil, JP
    Dranssart, M
    Cognet, F
    Piard, F
    Hillon, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2002, 26 (04) : 541 - 552