DNA-mediated vaccination conferring protection against infectious bursal disease in broiler chickens in the presence of maternal antibody

被引:29
作者
Hsieh, Ming Kun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Ching Ching [1 ]
Lin, Tsang Long [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Vet Med, Dept Comparat Pathobiol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Grad Inst Microbiol & Publ Hlth, Coll Vet Med, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
关键词
Infectious bursal disease; Infectious bursal disease virus; DNA vaccine; Maternal antibody; T-CELL RESPONSES; CROSS-PRESENTATION; NEWCASTLE-DISEASE; INTERFERON-GAMMA; VIRUS IBDV; CPG MOTIFS; IMMUNIZATION; IMMUNITY; AGENT; IMMUNOGENICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.066
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The objective of the present study was to determine if a DNA vaccine carrying large segment gene of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) could confer protection against infectious bursal disease (IBD) in broiler chickens in the presence of maternal antibody. Broiler chickens with maternal antibody titers to IBDV were intramuscularly injected with a DNA plasmid coding for VP2, VP3, and VP4 genes of IBDV strain variant E (VE) (P/VP243/E) at 1-day, 1-week, and/or 2 weeks old. The dose of P/VP243/E used ranging from 400 mu g to 10 mg. Broiler chickens at 3 weeks old were orally challenged with IBDV strain (VE) and observed for 10 days. Only broiler chickens vaccinated with 7.5 or 10 mg of P/VP243/E 3 times had 90 or 100% protection against challenge by IBDV strain VE and protected broiler chickens had significantly higher (P< 0.05) bursa weight/body weight (B/B) ratios, significantly lower (P< 0.05) bursal lesion scores, and the absence of IBDV antigens in bursae determined by immunofluorescent antibody assay (IFA). Antibody titers to IBDV as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or virus neutralization (VN) assay in chickens of each group in each trial were gradually decreased prior to challenge. There was no significant difference (P> 0.05) in ELISA or VN titers to IBDV among all groups of broiler chickens or among the groups of broiler chickens vaccinated with various dose of P/VP243/E before challenge. Broiler chickens in the groups receiving 7.5 or 10 mg of P/VP243/E had significantly lower (P< 0.05) DIM or VN titers to IBDV than those in the challenge control (CC) groups or the other groups vaccinated with various dose of P/VP243/E after challenge. Broiler chickens in the groups vaccinated with 10 mg of P/VP243/E 3 times had significantly higher (P <0.05) stimulation indices for IBDV-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation response than those in the vector control (VC) or CC group at 14, 21, 24, or 31 days after first DNA vaccination. The results indicated that DNA vaccination with DNA encoding large segment gene of IBDV confers protection against challenge by IBDV in broiler chickens with maternal antibody to IBDV. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3936 / 3943
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Efficacy of DNA vaccines against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens enhanced by coadministration with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide
    Wang, XQ
    Jiang, P
    Deen, S
    Wu, JQ
    Liu, XW
    Xu, JR
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2003, 47 (04) : 1305 - 1312
  • [22] Protection Conferred by Coarse Spray Vaccination Against Challenge with Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in Commercial Broilers
    Banda, Alejandro
    Villegas, Pedro
    Purvis, Linda B.
    Perozo, Francisco
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2008, 52 (02) : 297 - 301
  • [23] Codon optimization and woodchuck hepatitis virus posttranscriptional regulatory element enhance the immune responses of DNA vaccines against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens
    Li, Kai
    Gao, Li
    Gao, Honglei
    Qi, Xiaole
    Gao, Yulong
    Qin, Liting
    Wang, Yongqiang
    Wang, Xiaomei
    [J]. VIRUS RESEARCH, 2013, 175 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [24] EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF PROTECTION CONFERRED BY A VACCINATION SCHEME AGAINST THE INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE IN BROILERS USING THE DEVENTER FORMULA
    Paredes V, Walter
    Icochea D'A, Eliana
    Sandoval Ch, Nieves
    Manchego S, Alberto
    [J]. REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES VETERINARIAS DEL PERU, 2009, 20 (01): : 81 - 89
  • [25] Oral DNA vaccination with the polyprotein gene of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) delivered by attenuated Salmonella elicits protective immune responses in chickens
    Li, Long
    Fang, Weihuan
    Li, Jianrong
    Fang, Li
    Huang, Yaowei
    Yu, Lian
    [J]. VACCINE, 2006, 24 (33-34) : 5919 - 5927
  • [26] Arginine and Vitamin E improve the antibody responses to infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and sheep red blood cells in broiler chickens
    Ruiz-Feria, C. A.
    Abdukalykova, S. T.
    [J]. BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (03) : 291 - 297
  • [27] Research Note: The infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease) vaccination scheme affects the quantitative and qualitative carcass characteristics and the immune response of Ross 308 broiler chickens
    Wegner, Marcin
    Gesek, Michal
    Banaszak, Miroslaw
    Adamski, Marek
    Wlazlak, Sebastian
    Biesek, Jakub
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 103 (12)
  • [28] Mucosal application of cationic poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles as carriers of DNA vaccine and adjuvants to protect chickens against infectious bursal disease
    Negash, Tamiru
    Liman, Martin
    Rautenschlein, Silke
    [J]. VACCINE, 2013, 31 (36) : 3656 - 3662
  • [29] Protective efficacy of a novel recombinant Marek's disease virus vector vaccine against infectious bursal disease in chickens with or without maternal antibodies
    Li, Kai
    Liu, Yongzhen
    Zhang, Yanping
    Gao, Li
    Liu, Changjun
    Cui, Hongyu
    Qi, Xiaole
    Gao, Yulong
    Zhong, Li
    Wang, Xiaomei
    [J]. VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 186 : 55 - 59
  • [30] Evaluation of protection efficiency of different vaccination programs against velogenic Newcastle disease virus in broiler chickens: Comparative in field and in laboratory studies
    Sultan, Serageldeen
    Hamed, Marwa
    Osman, Nabila
    [J]. THAI JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (01): : 141 - 150