Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Short Forms in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

被引:87
作者
Chiarotto, Alessandro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vanti, Carla [4 ]
Cedraschi, Christine [5 ]
Ferrari, Silvano [6 ]
Resende, Fernanda de Lima e Sa [4 ]
Ostelo, Raymond W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pillastrini, Paolo [4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Hlth Sci, Fac Earth & Life Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neurol Sci, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Gen Med Rehabil, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Padua, Dept Biomed Sci, Padua, Italy
关键词
Chronic low back pain; pain self-efficacy; measurement; short forms; DISABILITY INDEX ODI; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; ITALIAN VERSION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DETECTABLE CHANGE; OUTCOME MEASURES; RASCH ANALYSIS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.012
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a valid and reliable patient-reported instrument used to assess pain self-efficacy in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Recently, the 2-item (PSEQ-2) and the 4-item (PSEQ-4) short versions were developed showing satisfactory measurement properties in mixed populations with chronic pain. The aim of this study was to examine responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of PSEQ, PSEQ-2, and PSEQ-4 in patients with CLBP. We used a sample of 104 patients undergoing multimodal physical therapy designed to partly change pain self-efficacy beliefs. Responsiveness was assessed by testing 16 a priori formulated hypotheses regarding effect sizes, areas under the curve, and correlations with changes in other instruments measuring other constructs. The MIC was calculated using an external anchor specific for pain self-efficacy and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method. The PSEQ and the PSEQ-4 met all hypotheses, whereas the PSEQ-2 met all but 1. The MICs were 5.5 for the PSEQ (9% of the scale range) and 1.5 for PSEQ-2 (13% scale range) and PSEQ-4 (6% scale range). MIC values were different for patients with low or high baseline values for all 3 instruments. The PSEQ and its short versions are adequately responsive instruments in patients with CLBP. Perspective: This study suggests that the PSEQ and its short versions are responsive measures of pain self-efficacy in patients with CLBP, adding to previous literature on their validity and reliability. Considering their similar responsiveness, the 4-item PSEQ could replace the original 10-item version in busy clinical or research settings. (C) 2016 by the American Pain Society
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 718
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Validation of the Japanese Version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain [J].
Adachi, Tomonori ;
Nakae, Aya ;
Maruo, Tomoyuki ;
Shi, Kenrin ;
Shibata, Masahiko ;
Maeda, Lynn ;
Saitoh, Youichi ;
Sasaki, Jun .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (08) :1405-1417
[2]   Definition of the construct to be measured is a prerequisite for the assessment of validity. The Neck Disability Index as an example [J].
Ailliet, Luc ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Rubinstein, Sidney M. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
van Tulder, Maurits W. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (07) :775-782
[3]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN EPIDEMIOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], PAIN PRACT
[5]   An Investigation of Pain Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Iranian Chronic Pain Patients: A Preliminary Validation of a Translated English-Language Scale [J].
Asghari, Ali ;
Nicholas, Michael K. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (04) :619-632
[6]   The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - An updated literature review [J].
Bjelland, I ;
Dahl, AA ;
Haug, TT ;
Neckelmann, D .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2002, 52 (02) :69-77
[7]   Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience [J].
Brod, Meryl ;
Tesler, Laura E. ;
Christensen, Torsten L. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (09) :1263-1278
[8]   Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening [J].
Cella, D ;
Hahn, EA ;
Dineen, K .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (03) :207-221
[9]   Evaluating Common Outcomes for Measuring Treatment Success for Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Chapman, Jens R. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Hermsmeyer, Jeffrey T. ;
Bransford, Richard J. ;
DeVine, John ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Lee, Michael J. .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) :S54-S68
[10]   The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation into Italian and Assessment of Its Measurement Properties [J].
Chiarotto, Alessandro ;
Vanti, Carla ;
Ostelo, Raymond W. ;
Ferrari, Silvano ;
Tedesco, Giuseppe ;
Rocca, Barbara ;
Pillastrini, Paolo ;
Monticone, Marco .
PAIN PRACTICE, 2015, 15 (08) :738-747