Artifact reduction in contrast-enhanced mammography

被引:10
作者
Gennaro, Gisella [1 ]
Baldan, Enrica [1 ]
Bezzon, Elisabetta [1 ]
Caumo, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Breast Imaging Unit, Via Gattamelata 64, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
Mammography; Contrast agent; Artifact; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-022-01211-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a new algorithm developed to reduce artifacts in dual-energy subtraction (DES) contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images while preserving contrast enhancement of possible lesions. Methods A retrospective multi-reader paired study was performed by using 134 CEM studies obtained from the first 134 women enrolled in a prospective clinical study aiming to compare the clinical performance of CEM to those of breast MRI in screening of women at increased risk of breast cancer. Four experienced readers compared independently the standard (STD) DES images with those obtained by reprocessing the raw images by a new algorithm (NEW), expected to reduce the DES artifact intensity. The intensity of three types of artifacts (breast-in-breast, ripple, and skinfold enhancement) and the intensity of possible contrast uptake were assessed visually and rated using a categorical ordinal scale. Proportions of images rated by the majority of readers as "Absent", "Weak", "Medium", "Strong" in each artifact intensity category were compared between the two algorithms. P-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The NEW algorithm succeeded in eliminating 84.5% of breast-in-breast artifacts, 84.2% of ripple artifacts, and 56.9% of skinfold enhancement artifacts versus STD DES images, and reduced the artifact intensity in 12.1%, 13.0%, and 28.8% of the images, respectively. The visibility of lesion contrast uptake was the same with the STD and the NEW algorithms. Conclusion The new dual-energy subtraction algorithm demonstrated to be effective in reducing/eliminating CEM-related artifacts while preserving lesion contrast enhancement.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Modality-Specific Artifacts and Other Factors Which May Interfere with Image Quality
    Bhimani, Chandni
    Li, Luna
    Liao, Lydia
    Roth, Robyn G.
    Tinney, Elizabeth
    Germaine, Pauline
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [2] The Rose model, revisited
    Burgess, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1999, 16 (03): : 633 - 646
  • [3] Combined Associations of Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors: Implications for Prevention of Breast Cancer
    Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
    Gunsoy, Necdet Burak
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (11):
  • [4] Contras enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions
    Ghaderi, Kimeya F.
    Phillips, Jordana
    Perry, Hannah
    Lotfi, Parisa
    Mehta, Tejas S.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2019, 39 (07) : 1907 - 1920
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)
    James, J. J.
    Tennant, S. L.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (08) : 715 - 723
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions
    Kamal, Rasha Mohamed
    Helal, Maha Hussien
    Wessam, Rasha
    Mansour, Sahar Mahmoud
    Godda, Iman
    Alieldin, Nelly
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (06) : 1049 - 1055
  • [7] Factors Associated With Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Karimi, Zahra
    Phillips, Jordana
    Slanetz, Priscilla
    Lotfi, Parisa
    Dialani, Vandana
    Karimova, Jane
    Mehta, Tejas
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (02) : 340 - 348
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study
    Knogler, Thomas
    Homolka, Peter
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Leithner, Robert
    Langs, Georg
    Waitzbauer, Martin
    Pinker-Domenig, Katja
    Leitner, Sabine
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 1575 - 1581
  • [9] IMAGES, IMAGE QUALITY AND OBSERVER PERFORMANCE - NEW HORIZONS IN RADIOLOGY LECTURE
    KUNDEL, HL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1979, 132 (02) : 265 - 271
  • [10] Artifacts in contrast-enhanced mammography: are there differences between vendors?
    Neppalli, Saish
    Kessell, Meredith A.
    Madeley, Carolyn R.
    Hill, Melissa L.
    Vlaskovsky, Philip S.
    Taylor, Donna B.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 80 : 123 - 130