A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intensive Nutrition Intervention Versus Standard Nutrition Care to Avoid Excess Weight Gain After Kidney Transplantation: The INTENT Trial

被引:36
作者
Henggeler, Cordula K. [1 ]
Plank, Lindsay D. [2 ]
Ryan, Kristin J. [1 ]
Gilchrist, Emily L. [1 ]
Casas, Jessie M. [3 ]
Lloyd, Lyn E. [3 ]
Mash, Laura E. [3 ]
McLellan, Sandra L. [3 ]
Robb, Jennifer M. [3 ]
Collins, Michael G. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Discipline Nutr, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Auckland City Hosp, Nutr Serv, Auckland Dist Hlth Board, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Auckland City Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Auckland Dist Hlth Board, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Med, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
RENAL-TRANSPLANT; BODY-COMPOSITION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; RISK-FACTOR; RECIPIENTS; MANAGEMENT; EXERCISE; OBESITY; PREDICTORS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jrn.2018.03.001
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: Excessive weight gain is common after kidney transplantation and increases cardiovascular risk. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to determine whether an intensive nutrition and exercise intervention delivered alongside routine post-transplant care would reduce post-transplant weight gain. Design: Single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Subjects and Setting: Adult kidney transplant recipients at a regional transplant center were recruited during routine outpatient clinic visits in the first month after transplant. Patients with a body mass index >40 kg/m(2) or <18.5 kg/m(2), severe malnutrition, or ongoing medical complications were excluded. Intervention: Participants were randomized to intensive nutrition intervention (individualized nutrition and exercise counselling; 12 dietitian visits; 3 exercise physiologist visits over 12 months) or to standard nutrition care (guideline based; 4 dietitian visits). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was weight at 6 months after transplant adjusted for baseline weight, obesity, and gender, analyzed using analysis of covariance. The secondary outcomes included body composition, biochemistry, quality of life, and physical function. Results: Thirty-seven participants were randomized to the intensive intervention (n = 19) or to standard care (n = 18); one intensive group participant withdrew before baseline. Weight increased between baseline, 6 and 12 months (78.0 +/- 13.7 [standard deviation], 79.6 +/- 13.0 kg, 81.6 +/- 12.9 kg; mean change 4.6% P < .001) but at 6 months did not differ significantly between the groups: 77.0 +/- 12.4 kg (intensive); 82.2 +/- 13.4 kg (standard); difference in adjusted means 0.4 kg (95% confidence interval: -2.2 to 3.0 kg); analysis of covariance P = .7. No between-group differences in secondary outcomes were observed. Across the whole cohort, total body protein and physical function (gait speed, sit to stand, grip strength, physical activity, and quality of life [all but 2 domains]) improved. However, adverse changes were seen for total body fat, HbA1c, and fasting glucose across the cohort. Conclusions: Kidney transplant recipients in the first year after transplant did not benefit from an intensive nutrition intervention compared with standard nutrition care, although weight gain was relatively modest in both groups. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 351
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] ANZDATA Registry, 2018, AUSTR AUSTR NZ DIAL, V18, P868
  • [2] Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient
    Baker, Richard J.
    Mark, Patrick B.
    Patel, Rajan K.
    Stevens, Kate K.
    Palmer, Nicholas
    [J]. BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 18
  • [3] Predictors of weight cain and cardiovascular risk in a cohort of racially diverse kidney transplant recipients
    Baum, CL
    Thielke, K
    Westin, E
    Kogan, E
    Cicalese, L
    Benedetti, E
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2002, 18 (02) : 139 - 146
  • [4] EVALUATION OF AN INVIVO PROMPT GAMMA NEUTRON-ACTIVATION FACILITY FOR BODY-COMPOSITION STUDIES IN CRITICALLY ILL INTENSIVE-CARE PATIENTS - RESULTS ON 41 NORMALS
    BEDDOE, AH
    STREAT, SJ
    HILL, GL
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1984, 33 (03): : 270 - 280
  • [5] Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate.: A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations
    Black, AE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2000, 24 (09) : 1119 - 1130
  • [6] Nutrition care process and mode part I : The 2008 update
    Bueche, Jennifer
    Charney, Pam
    Pavlinac, Jessie
    Skipper, Annalynn
    Thompson, Elizabeth
    Myers, Esther
    Lewis, Nancy
    Smith, Elise
    Israel, Donna
    Beto, Judy
    Conkin, Claudia A.
    Zook-Weaver, Melinda
    Geiger, Constance J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2008, 108 (07) : 1113 - 1117
  • [7] Pre-transplant predictors of one yr weight gain after kidney transplantation
    Cashion, A. K.
    Hathaway, D. K.
    Stanfill, A.
    Thomas, F.
    Ziebarth, J. D.
    Cui, Y.
    Cowan, P. A.
    Eason, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (11) : 1271 - 1278
  • [8] Nutritional management of overweight and obesity in adult kidney transplant recipients
    Chadban, Steven
    Chan, Maria
    Fry, Karen
    Patwardhan, Aditi
    Ryan, Catherine
    Trevillian, Paul
    Westgarth, Fidye
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 15 : S52 - S55
  • [9] Nutritional management of diabetes mellitus in adult kidney transplant recipients
    Chadban, Steven
    Chan, Maria
    Fry, Karen
    Patwardhan, Aditi
    Ryan, Catherine
    Trevillian, Paul
    Westgarth, Fidye
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 15 : S37 - S39
  • [10] Evidence-based Guidelines for the Nutritional Management of Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Chan, Maria
    Patwardhan, Aditi
    Ryan, Catherine
    Trevillian, Paul
    Chadban, Steven
    Westgarth, Fidye
    Fry, Karen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION, 2011, 21 (01) : 47 - 51